Laura Cereta's In Defense Of The Education Of Women

489 Words1 Page

In Laura Cereta’s, In Defense of the Education of Women the author argues that women “have been able by nature to be exceptional, but have chosen lesser goals”. Cereta claims that women are just as intellectual and capable of menial jobs, she defends this notion primarily by addressing what she explained as women’s lack of ambition. Laura Cereta’s arguments that “women have been able by nature to be exceptional, but have chosen lesser goals. With correlation of were they were placed by society, women did not have the liberty to advance their intellect, which Cereta strongly preached for—“an education intended to free or liberate the mind” (EH, 300). Women’s supposed lack of ambition and their need part their hair correctly, or decorating their fingers with pearls are attributed to their involuntarily placement in society, “daughters were raised to be “loyal wives and successful household managers” (EH, 297). …show more content…

However, on the other side of the binary, is Mary Wollstonecraft states, “Women are told from their infancy, and taught by the example of their mothers, that a little knowledge of human weakness, justly termed cunning, softness of temper, outward obedience…will obtain for them the protection of man; and should they be beautiful, every thing else is needless, for at least twenty years of their lives” (Wollstonecraft, 19). Wollstonecraft main reason for women’s lack of rights was due to their subordination to men: women’s unique attributes were used to allure men rather then to benefit themselves, such as beauty, mothers would train their daughters to attract

Open Document