Dahl and Hitchcock are two authors/directors of the story “Lamb to the slaughter.” where Mary kills her husband with a leg of lamb out of rage and sadness. Dahl wrote the book while Hitchcock turned it into a short film. Both stories have a character named Mary, who is one of the main characters. Mary was smart enough to think up a fake story about her husband’s death, and call the police. Mary was shown as a clever and fast thinker, but also a bit overreactive. While both Roald Dahl and Alfred Hitchcock used actions to develop Mary, Dahl relied on thoughts while Hitchcock relied on speech. Both Dahl and Hitchcock relied heavily on actions. For instance, In Hitchcock's’ story, Mary has messed up the house to hide her doing. In addition, Mary …show more content…
Here, Mary thinks about what she should say to the grocer. This shows, Mary is clever to think of her speech. Now, Dahl then showed that Mary thought about ways to dispose of the weapon/leg of lamb. In the end, Dahl used thoughts to prove Mary, and since it was a book, he had limited options on how to describe Mary. Hitchcock relied on speech to make Mary a character. As shown in Hitchcock’s story, Mary is given off to be very upset when Patrick goes to leave, even saying “No, you can’t you can’t, I won’t let you.” Showing all of her emotions clearly though her voice. The after Mary killed Patrick, Mary convinces the police to believe her lies. In the end, Hitchcock gives Mary most characterization through speech because of his advantages for making a film. Overall, Hitchcock and Dahl characterize Mary with actions. With this, actions was the most common trait used to describe Mary. But, Dahl does use actions more because of the fact he will need to be able to give the reader a picture in their head with words. Hitchcock uses speech because of his filming advantages. Dahl and Hitchcock both characterize Mary fairly well, but Dahl did a better job because he was able to put more tiny details in his
The characters in Hitchcock's films play a very important role in creating the tensions and twists, causing that heart stopping moment where you just want to yell at the TV.
Readers are met with a sense of familiarity as they recall a childhood nursery rhyme, “Mary Had A Little Lamb”. By using this Dahl created a link between the story and the reader themselves. The allusion adds a sense of irony as well, because while the nursery rhyme is sweet and innocent, murder is not. Irony can also be found in other parts of the passage. In the text Roald Dahl includes some dialogue from the cops which reads “‘Personally, I think it’s right here on the premises.’
Would you kill the husband you love, to save your unborn child? Would you deceive yourself and those around you; to save your unborn child? In Roald Dahl’s short story, “Lamb to the Slaughter”, the protagonist, Mary Maloney is a very dynamic character. She has a dual nature since she is very cunning yet very caring, making her the perfect murderer along with the perfect mother. Firstly, she is very deceitful and has the ability to easily cover up her lies. Not only that, Mary is a very clever character who always makes the most intelligent choices. Lastly, the woman is very dutiful, caring and is very aware of her responsibilities as both a wife and a mother. Therefore all of these characteristics make Mary Maloney a very dynamic character
Alfred Hitchcock's idea of horror involves human suspense and teh realistic aspect of scary situations. Hitchcocks masterful directing leads the audience to be the frist to understand what is going on. The characters are left in the dark until the suspense reaches its climax. As the impending danger builds, the viewer is allowed to wtiness the situation before the character. This raises the level of suspense making it more realistic. Hitchcock takes normal situations and adds a terffiying twist. The twist is always something that has never happened, but is definetely possible. Hitchcocks The Birds is an excellent example of this. He takes normal situation with normal birds and turns them into killers. As the birds gather behind one unsuspecting victim, only the audience is allowed to see the impending danger. The woman is calm and collected as she waits on the bench. Hitchcock adds a little scare music and the woman suddenly realizes she is being watched. She whips around in horror and the birds are there ready to attack. This scfene is not a common occurance, but to an overactive imagination it could become a very real possibility.
Alfred Hitchcock masters the art of storytelling, framing every shot carefully to help further the plot and develop characters. The techniques of visual storytelling that Hitchcock implements in his films are not just meant to entertain; they all serve specific purposes in building his fictional universes. Hitchcock establishes the personalities of his characters by showing exactly what the characters see and hear as well as their reactions to their surroundings. Along with point-of-view shots, Hitchcock employs montage editing, creating suspense and further allowing characters to be seen as multi-faceted beings.
Mary is no more capable of murder in her right mind than I am of swimming across the Atlantic Ocean. Roald Dahl’s short story, ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’, is about the murder of police detective Patrick Maloney by his wife Mary. Driven to homicide after her husband’s unexpected announcement that he’s leaving her and their unborn child, Mary quickly regains her senses after fatally killing him with the leg of lamb. However, she would have never killed her husband if she was in the right state of mind. Mary is shown to be temporarily insane when committing the murder of her husband because of the fact that she was pregnant, she was in a state of in denial and desperation, and most importantly that she had exhibited visible signs that are attributes of a person with mental instabilities.
One of Dahl’s most prominent styles used to highlight betrayal throughout the story is point of view. The point of view of the story is told in is third-person limited, meaning the reader only gets to read the thoughts of one character. That character was Mary Maloney, the main character and wife of Patrick Maloney. Hearing only one characters view of events can make readers opinions biased, meaning the feelings they feel towards characters are from the influence of Mary Maloney. The readers do not know what Patrick Maloney is thinking so it is hard for readers to sympathize him in the beginning of the story when he tells Mary he wants a divorce (Dahl). As one critic stated, readers are unable to see into his mind, he is immediately marked as the antagonist (Bertonneau). Another critic believed that having no knowledge of his motives made his actions seem inexcusable.
One major attribute in Hitchcock films is how creatively Hitchcock tricks the audience about the fate of the characters and the sequence of events. Many people argue that it is a tactic by Hitchcock to surprise his audience in order to increase the suspense of the movie. For example, in Shadow of a Doubt, the audience assumes that young Charlie is an innocent young girl who loves her uncle dearly. However as the movie progresses, Young Charlie is not as innocent as the audience suspects. Young Charlie, once a guiltless child, ends up killing her evil uncle. In Vertigo, the same Hitchcock trickery takes place. In the beginning, the audience has the impression that the Blond women is possessed by another woman who is trying to kill her. The audience also has the notion that the detective is a happy man who will solve the murder case correctly. Just before the movie ends, the audience realizes that the detective was specifically hired by a man to kill his wife. The detective, in the end, seems to be the hopeless, sad victim.
Mary is described as short and ordinary, and Erdrich writes, “Her name was square and practical as the rest of her”. The uninteresting description of her makes her seem like a part of the town, which is written as grey, old, and uneventful. While Karl stops to look at the graceful bright beauty of the tree, the text says “Mary trudged solidly forward, hardly glancing at it,” showing her obvious disinterest in the contrast of the tree from the dull, grey town. When the dog attacked Karl, Mary ran towards her aunt’s house instead of back to the train. She stayed in the town and fit in
In Hitchcock’s narrative structure, he focuses on relationships. The relationship between society and their thoughts of morality, guilt and innocence. In the film, we never witness a murder, only the outcome of them. What we do see are the reactions to the killings. Every single week, the newspapers write
Hitchcock has a way of throwing clues in the face of the spectator, yet still allows some room for the spectator to find their own less obvious details. In the same museum scene, Hitchcock shows the viewer exactly what he wants them to see. In a sense, Hitchcock can be very manipulative with the camera. The audience sees the picture containing the women with a curl in her hair holding flowers, and then the direct connection is made by the camera, by showing the curl in Madeline’s hair, and the flowers sitting next to her. The spectator is led to believe that they have solved the mystery and she is truly possessed by the women in the picture. However, Hitchcock does this on purpose to lead the audience away from the truth that she is only acting. It is for these reasons that Hitchcock’s work at an auteur adds a level of depth and intrigue.
This was his most experimental movie, he describes this film to be an assembly of pieces to create fright and considered it the strongest demonstration of ’the pure cinema’ Hitchcock invoked it, pure cinema meant using the camera to tell the story. For example, instead of a character saying what a character intends to do pure cinema will cut between their incomplete task and the person to imply what is going on in their mind. Pure cinema was used to create an overly dramatic environment in place of dialogue. The director does not leave the viewer to watch the movie from a distance as someone who did no belong there instead. The movie’s psychological situation is built combining details and these details reveal the psychological meaning.
In “Lamb to the Slaughter”, Roald Dahl uses diction, details, and syntax to emphasize the matter-of-fact tone that is consistent throughout the entire story. Diction is a key element of tone that conveys this matter-of-fact tone. For example, Mary Maloney says to herself after killing her husband, “All right… So I’ve killed him” (Dahl 320). This sentence is lacking emotion. It states a pure fact, without going into further detail and captures a turning point in Mary Maloney’s way of thinking. By telling herself “all right,” Mary distances herself from the murder. She is detached from her own story and does not reveal any qualms about murdering her own husband. Similarly, Dahl uses the next sentence to describe Mary’s thoughts by explaining,
Near the middle of the story we see Mary exhibit her bad sinister character; her personality and feelings suddenly change when she murders her own husband by hitting him at the back of the head with a frozen lamb leg. After denying all of Mary’s helpful deeds, Patrick told her to sit down so that he can tell her something serious; the story doesn’t tell us what he says to her but Mary suddenly changes after he tells her something, her “instinct was not to believe any of it” (Dahl 2). She just responded with “I’ll get the supper” (Dahl 2) and felt nothing of her body except for nausea and a desire to vomit. She went down the cellar, opened the freezer, grabbed a frozen leg of lamb, went back upstairs, came behind Patrick, and swung the big leg of lamb as hard as she could to the back of his head killing him. This act of sudden violence shows how much she has gone ...
When the police arrived they try to understand and figure out how Patrick has been killed. But unluckily the officers can not notice Mrs. Maloney was the killer. At the end of the book Mary Maloney giggles when the officers said, “Probably right under our very noses. What you think, Jack?” (Dahl 18). Throughout the beginning, Mary Maloney seemed like a nice caring wife but what Patrick said caused her to do a crime. At that point, Mary knew she got away she eliminated the evidence and managed to escape. Mary laughing shows readers that the killing of her husband was not important to her at all. Therefore the theme of this story is to not trust everybody.