Lack Of Knowledge In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

933 Words2 Pages

When Victor Frankenstein created the creature, he immediately ran away at the sight of life in the body he instilled life in. Frankenstein then sat back and watched as the monster committed murder upon many people, including his friends and family. The monster learned how to act by simply watching society and copying what he saw. He watched the DeLacey’s and saw how they left at the sight of him. He was not raised as he should have been. If Victor would have stayed with the creature and taught it how to behave, he could have been helped. While he would not have been treated equally, his life would have been different. Society is quick to judge anyone that looks different than the standard they see fit. Rather than being treated as an equal …show more content…

I would tell someone close to me that I trust about what has happened in order to ensure my safety. I believe I would raise the creature to behave well, and hope to have him accepted by my close friends and family. 2-B Knowledge can be a fantastic thing. It can help the world to gain insight on the lives of people, discover medicine, and find ways to better the environment. There are countless ways in which knowledge can improve the world. However with that knowledge can come people that use it for evil. People that do not look to the future to see what the consequences of their actions will be are the ones that lead to destruction. Knowledge or intelligence can be a blessing if used properly. People can find ways to cure diseases, save the environment, learn about the nature of the world, and countless other things. With this knowledge, however, comes responsibility. If people use knowledge for selfless reasons such as curing cancer, it can be amazing. The study of global warming is a great initiative to save the planet, and an incredible use of knowledge. When used selflessly, knowledge is a

Open Document