The Silent Witnesses: Should they be held accountable? Everyone claims there is a moral standard in the world, yet how rarely do you see people living to this standard? Maybe Kitty Genovese would have lived if this moral standard was lived up to in most situations in society. In Queens, New York on March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was raped and stabbed outside of Kew Gardens apartment complex. It started off as per usual with Mrs. Genovese heading home from her bartending job. As she was walking back to her apartment, she was approached by her aggressor and was stabbed twice in the back. Kitty screamed and pleaded for help and only one of her neighbors replied, “Hey! Leave that girl alone from their apartment causing the aggressor to run off. …show more content…
After 10 minutes the aggressor had then returned and frantically searched for Kitty, when the aggressor eventually found Mrs. Genovese he proceeded to then rape, mug, and continue stabbing her for a span of 30 minutes which resulted in her unfortunate passing. No calls were made until around 45 minutes later. Mrs. Genovese could ve still been alive and well to this day if the 32 people who heard her screams had done something besides watch from their windows. If these 32 people followed the moral standard of our society, she would have been saved, but they chose to conform to the bystander effect. An effect placed on people that withholds them from their own individual decisions but instead drives them to follow the majority's decision. This situation is seen in many aspects of our current world and happens at a frequent rate. Could a governing law that would prevent others from “doing nothing” perhaps fix this recurring issue? The Genovese syndrome, also referred to as the bystander effect, is a theory that individuals are less inclined to intervene or take action in situations where there are others present. This was discovered in the Kitty Genovese case, explained earlier in this article. Where 32 people watched Mrs. …show more content…
In order to prevent future catastrophes like this, there should be a bystander law instated into our society that provokes people from being careless and neglectful to situations and forces them to help unless it endangers themselves. If people choose to not help when given the appropriate opportunity, they will have to in turn suffer a hefty fine, or even possible imprisonment. This law would provide sufficient resolutions towards many issues within our current society and make our communities more safe and habitable. Arguers against the law introduce the idea that partaking in the bystander law could perhaps make the situation worse than not intervening, which in some cases is in fact true, but how could making something as simple as a phone call to a first responder have a negative effect? It wouldn't, it would only be beneficial to the situation. This proves how even doing something as little as making a phone call could in fact save someone's life, instead of turning a shoulder and ignoring the situation altogether. Recent and past news events involving bystanders who witness but do not report or help victims in crisis have led concerned citizens in the state of California, and across the country, to lobby their
day, we remain bystanders not just to the people who need our help, but to numerous political, social and environmental problems that we should be concerned about, but instead feel helpless and powerless to face it and do something about it. This paper will discuss the few reasons why we fall victim to the bystander effect, how crowds influence our decision to help, why some people help while others don’t, as well as ways to become an active bystander. “The bystander is a modern archetype, from the
no helpful actions will be taken towards the emergency and the consequences could be fatal. This seems to sound a little backwards. It would be fair to say that common sense leads us to believe that there is safety in numbers. However, through research and to this phenomenon in our society, the proof of this definition is all too real and quite shocking. John Darley and Bibb Latane revealed that the amount of time a participant takes to initiate action and seek aid varies in accordance to the
On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was murdered outside a liquor store at 3:20 AM. She screamed for help, but her pleas were mostly ignored as neighbours dismissed it as a drunken brawl between lovers. Her killer stabbed her twice in the back, before a neighbour scared him away by shouting, “Let that girl alone.” Still, no one went to check up on Genovese who, now injured, continued to cry out, “If someone doesn’t help me I’m going to die!” (Pelonero, 2014). Her killer returned 10 minutes later to
have agency over our actions and what we decide but a lot of our own actions is more a part of a group mentality. Also, individual’s go along with a group’s influence so they feel better about themselves because then they won’t be ostracized. This paper will analyze different aspects of individual behavior and
Justifying the Death Penalty: An Analysis of Two Essays “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement” (Tolkien, 1994.) Capital punishment, or more commonly known as the death penalty, has been a hotly controversial issue throughout the history of humankind. Some people have the view that Hammurabi had in his own law code, “an eye for an eye,” whereas others believe that it is wrong to kill another person
behaviors are helping, comforting, sharing, and cooperation. The term was coined in the 1970s and introduced as an antonym for “antisocial behavior.” Extensive study on prosocial behavior was conducted after an incident involving a young girl named Kitty Genovese, wherein she was murdered on her way home from work; she cried for help and although many heard her, none came to her aid until it was far too late (Cherry, 2005). This study aims to determine the students of De La Salle University who display
Factors Influencing Conformity and Obedience The object of this paper is to critically evaluate factors influencing conformity and obedience. I intend to do this by researching conformity and obedience, using books and the Internet. I also hope to briefly write about relevant case studies, by psychologists such as Milgram and Baumrind, and include real life examples to present a well-informed essay. Conformity and obedience are both forms of social influence which is described as "the process
historian Michael Grant has called ‘the nastiest blood-sport ever invented’ [it] was much loved in ancient Rome” (Baker 3). It is also well known that over the years, various cultures have practiced human sacrifice. “The Aztecs pr... ... middle of paper ... ...ouse Publishers, 2001. 32-4. Print. Garcia, Stephen M., et al. “Crowded Minds: The Implicit Bystander Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83.4 2002: 843-53. PsycArticles EBSCO. Web. 25 Apr. 2011. Jackson, Shirley. “The