Kesha Sebert V. Lukasz Gottwald: A Case Study

1656 Words4 Pages

Kesha Sebert v. Lukasz Gottwald is an ongoing case in which “Dr. Luke” sued both Kesha and her mother for the breaching of Kesha’s contract. This is due to Kesha’s lawsuit filed against Dr. Luke in October of 2014. Kesha claims that Dr. Luke was “guilty of sexual assault and battery, sexual harassment, gender violence, civil harassment, violation of California’s unfair business laws, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent retention and supervision.” (Merriman, Rebecca. "Kesha 's dramatic legal battle with alleged rapist Dr Luke".) It is obvious that Kesha should be released from this ludicrous ideal, and be freed from the contact that ties her to her rapist. Kesha claims that Dr. Luke has been making sexual advances on …show more content…

Luke’s list of deeds: causing a young girl to starve herself to the point of rehabilitation. It’s not uncommon for celebrities to pressured into losing a few pounds for the sake of the media by their agents and producers. Anorexia is increasing in the United States every year. Due to the number of cases that go unreported, statistics vary, however the Federal Office on Women’s Health, approximately 5 million or more girls have an eating disorder of some kind. The emphasis on having a fantasic body in the entertainment industry is obvious to any discerning eye, however, this does not make it okay. Body image issues are quite common and extremely harmful, and thus should not be answered with a cry of “just lose more weight if you want to make yourself and others happy!” Kesha was more than unhappy with herself after being bullied into losing weight to fit the media’s standard of attractive, and it’s all thanks to Dr. …show more content…

Rather than teaching people to be decent human beings, we have instead created a stigma against victims in order to dance around solving the actual issue. All it would take to stop rape culture and victim blaming would be realizing that rape is a choice. One may choose to rape a person or not, and therefore the choice lies in their hands. Whether the victim was not in their right mind or not does not matter, but rather if the rapist chose to be a rapist or not. They can always chose to not have sex with someone against their will, but the victim cannot. How is it fair that someone has horrible things forced upon them, but then it is their fault rather than the person who actively decided to rape another human being? Is it the victim’s fault in a murder case, by that logic, because they should have defended themselves better? Should we not punish the murderer and rather the victim? No, of course not. So why punish victims of rape because “they could have defended themselves a little more or taken more precautions”? Why not teach people not to

More about Kesha Sebert V. Lukasz Gottwald: A Case Study

Open Document