Juan Perón was a charismatic and inviting ex-military politician. He was the smiling face and sharp brain Argentina had been searching for. His involvement with the labor unions was the reason for his rise to power. Juan Perón’s leadership from 1943 to 1955 greatly affected labor unions in Argentina by granting the unions power in the political world, giving the unions someone they could trust, and by implementing complete control over the unions and the rest of Argentina during his presidency.
Before his presidency, Perón’s appetite for power and sympathy for the unions drew him to give the unions more political power in exchange for support for his presidential campaign. Perón grew up on a ranch and knew quite a bit about the lower-class way of life. This upbringing and knowledge of the working class helped give him a leg up against other politicians (DeChancie 20) . During the first years of his military and political career, he talked and went to bars with the lower- and working-class peoples (Madsen 46) . Perón made it very clear to the workers that he could be trusted because he was one of them (Madsen 46) . However, Perón's rise "wouldn't be possible without a radical political movement that advocate[d] bringing industry and government under the control of labor unions" (Duarte de Perón 81) .
Juan Perón created his own political party, the Peronist Party, which followed his political movement, Peronism. Perón never clearly defined what Peronism was because he was constantly changing details about what Peronism was really about, so no one could truly define Peronism. Generally, Peronism targeted its views somewhere between communism and capitalism (DeChancie 58) . Once Perón was more powerful, it was considered "illega...
... middle of paper ...
...pected (Page 181) . Soon, unproved allegations emerged accusing Perón and Evita of using money reserved for the workers to enrich themselves (Poneman 71) .
Perón began to control the media to keep up his good image for both the people of Argentina, and the rest of the world (DeChancie 62) . Perón ordered officers to shut down any anti-Peronist newspapers and radio shows; it also became a crime to speak poorly of Perón and the Argentine government. Perón called anti-Peronists “unpatriotic” and thought it should be illegal to be against Peronism (DeChancie 58) .
The government under Perón was highly biased toward Perón. Perón won over two-thirds of the seats in the Chamber of Deputies for the Peronist machine (Goldwert 93) . The Senate was completely Peronist except for two seats (Goldwert 93) . Perón continued to call the anti- Peronist side unpatriotic.
At first, the working class heavily supported Allende's campaign. A new movement of younger worker influence occurred during this time period, allowing Allende to accomplish many of the things he did. For instance, in the Yarur factory there was the "strike of 1962" which was the workers rebellion to the new Taylor system of the new generation of workers. They also rebelled because of the "union question" which revolved around three things: job security, free unions, and the elimination of the Taylor system. These were all things that Allende promised to fix, so naturally after a 9 week strike the people of the Yarur factory supported Allende and the promises he gave. All the workers in the Yarur factory were also deeply affected by the characteristics of postwar Chile: "dependency and stagflation, economic inequality and social inequality, the concentration of wealth and the persistence of poverty, the hegemony of the rich and the powerlessness of the poor" (54). These characteristics were the reasons that the working class suffered in Chile, as well as the...
The first turning point in hope for the Chilean road to socialism was that of the election of Salvador Allende as president, which gave many Yarur workers the belief that a ‘workers government’ was on their side. “For the first time, a self-proclaimed ‘workers government’ ruled Chile, dominated by the Left and Pledged to socialist revolution” (Winn, 53). Allende’s role as president gave identity to the Yarur workers that they were being represented and because of so, their struggles of working in the factory conditions set by Amador Yarur would come to an end. This identification with Allende as being represented by there own voice became the first stepping-stone to the demand for socialization of the factory. “The election of a ‘Popular Government’ was a signal...
In 1938, the Chavez family lost their farm due to the Great Depression. They were forced to relocate to California and become migrant workers. Chavez was distressed by the poor treatment that migrant farmworkers endured on a daily basis. His powerful religious convictions, dedication to change, and a skill at non violent organizing cultivated the establishment of the United Farmworkers (UFW). It was also referred to as “La Causa” by supporters and eventually became a vital movement for self-determination in the lives of California's farmworkers. The astounding nationwide lettuce and grape boycotts along with public support revealed the atrocities of California agribusiness and resulted in the first union hiring halls and collective bargaining for migrant workers. The details of the childhood of Cesar Chavez and how they would later shape his actions are a vital aspect of this book and the establishment of the farm workers movement.
Chávez’s leadership was based on an unshakable commitment to nonviolence, personal sacrifice and a strict work ethic. He emphasized the necessity of adhering to nonviolence, even when faced with violence from employers and growers, because he knew if the strikers used violence to further their goals, the growers and police would not hesitate to respond with even greater vehemence. Despite his commitment to nonviolence, many of the movement’s ‘enemies’, so to speak, made efforts to paint the mo...
Cesario Estrada Chavez, or Cesar Chavez, as he is more commonly known, was an American farm worker, community organizer, and civil rights leader who co-founded the National United Farm Workers Association in 1962. His accomplishments as a leader have been chronicled in numerous literary works and have upheld him as one of the most recognized Mexican-American leaders of the last century. In this piece, I aim to analyze Cesar Chavez's leadership style by looking at his accomplishments as a leader, and explore some of his many enduring contributions to society. I will use Peter Northouse’s book, Introduction to Leadership, to help examine Cesar Chavez’s approach to leadership.
They believed that their approaches to making changes for the workers would work if they continued practicing the same method. Oftentimes their very own methods worked, and would result in the desired way. Sometimes however these methods would lead to quite a bit of anger from those that they opposed. The opposition would call on the courts to attempt to get the union leaders to stop whatever their union was doing. When the leaders did not do this, they were imprisoned. This was the main reason for Chavez's imprisonment. While this possibly partially led to Hoffa's imprisonment, his involvement with the mafia was most likely the main reason for his arrest.
Since 1962, Chavez created and maintained a union for farm workers called the United Farm Workers of America. He went through many hard times and had to make very hard decisions but nothing stopped him from giving up on his dreams to help other people. In Document A, Dick Meister talks about how he saw the UFW through his point of view, a highly skeptical reporter from San Francisco. He says ...
With respect to director Luna’s vision, the history of the farm workers’ struggle has some significant plot ho...
Juan Evo Morales Ayma, known by many as Evo, was born on October 26, 1959 in Orinoca, Oruro. His father Dionisio Morales Choque and mother Maria Mamani had in total seven children, two of whom didn’t survive past childhood. His upbringing will later become clear foreshadowing of the way in which he would rule. The house he grew up in was an adobe house, no more than ten by thirteen feet, which had a straw roof. He began working with his father harvesting sugar cane in Argentina at age six and by age twelve he helped his father herd llamas from Oruro to Independencia, a province of Cochabamba. While continuing to herd llamas as a means of making a living, he organized a soccer team and was elected technical director of selection for the canton’s team only two years later at age sixteen. Evo then moved to Oruro in order to attend high school and paid the bills by laying bricks, baking and playing trumpet in the Royal Imperial Band. Although he attended Beltran Avila High School, he was not able to finish his schooling and completed mandatory military service in La Paz.
Cesar Chavez urged Latinos to register and vote, He traveled throughout california and made speeches to support the workers rights he later became cso director in 1958. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesar_Chavez )
In 1940s Argentina, the populist style was beginning to dominate the political scene and its greatest trailblazer was Colonel turned President, Juan Peron. Peron rose to power using populist techniques of the time. He began by building relationships with the working class, talking one on one with the labor leaders and listening to their concerns. This intimate setting made him seem like he truly cared for the working class and unions, not just as a politician, but as a friend (Fraser, 40). A vital and unforgettable aspect of Juan Peron’s rise to power was the contributions of his wife, Eva Peron. Eva’s fanatic support for Peron’s vision of the “New Argentina” allowed him to ultimately secure the love of the people.
One of the greatest civil rights activists of our time; one who believed the ways of Gandhi and Martin Luther King that “violence can only hurt us and our cause” (Cesar Chavez); a quiet, devoted, small catholic man who had nothing just like those he help fight for; “one of America's most influential labor leaders of the late twentieth century” (Griswold del Castillo); and one “who became the most important Mexican-American leader in the history of the United States” (Ender). Cesar Chavez; an American farm worker, who would soon become the labor leader that led to numerous improvements for union workers; it is recorded that Chavez was born near Yuma, Arizona on March 31, 1927 and died on April 23, 1993 in San Luis, Arizona. (Wikipedia) His life affected many others as his unselfish deeds changed the labor union force forever. This essay will discuss the reasons Cesar Chavez became involved in Union rights, the immediate impact he had, and also the legacy he left behind with his actions that influenced American society.
Juan Perón and Getúlio Vargas were very different in how they decided to do things while in power. Juan Peron felt as though more things could be accomplished with force while Getulio Vargas felt the complete opposite. Vargas tried his best to accomplish things without the feeling of force or violence. But somehow that didn't benefit him as much as you would think. It was almost as if people needed to be forced in order to actually listen, it was almost as if people could care less about was Vargas was trying to do to help everyone in Brazil. Vargas truly wanted change, “he proposed a comprehensive labor code, although union leaders -many of whom were communists and anarcho-syndicalists- did not support him, considering him just another incumbent politician. Is platform advocated the
Who has the greater legitimacy to represent the people? The president or the legislatures. In comparing the Chilean 1970 Presidential Election to 1979 Spanish appointment of Adolfo Suirez as Prime Minister, Linz notes “Allende received a six-year mandate for controlling the government even with much less than a majority of the popular vote, while Suirez, with a plurality of roughly the same size, found it necessary to work with other parties to sustain a minority government”. Linz supports the fusion of the executive and legislative branches because it forces a sense of cooperation. He points out that “presidential systems may be more or less dependent on the cooperation of the legislature; the balance between executive and legislative power in such systems can thus vary considerably” Linz admits that “presidential elections do offer the indisputable advantage of allowing the people to choose their chief executive openly, directly, and for a predictable span rather than leaving that decision to the backstage maneuvering of the politicians.” but qualifies it by stating that it is only and beneficial if the majority of the people of spoken. In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Shugart’s critical appraisal of “The Perils of Presidentialism” they offer counter arguments when they suggest that a bicameral parliament can just as easily have dual legitimacy issues as a President and legislative body. It should be recognized that Linz does not address the checks and balances that allows for a more regulated government ensuring that power is not concentrated in the hands of one group. Nor does he address that elections
Conflict, and compromise. What is it? It is a problem, and a solution, in which our (Evan and I) topic claims. Our topic is about Salvador Allende, the president of Chile from 1970 to 1973, and what he did as a president. He was a socialist president, and this caused problems, but this also created solutions. Chile had problems with inflation and malnourished children and people trying to overthrow Allende. Allende didn’t pay attention to the negative people, and mainly focused his idea of socialism on the working, middle class.