John Mitchell

689 Words2 Pages

Summary: This Case Study is about a successful woman, Krista Aklen a Developer and Director of Art Programs for the city. Krista encounters herself in the dilemma of budget cuts, and the city had to make reductions in staff and office space. The director of Parks and Recreation John Mitchell called Krista for a meeting to tell her about a decision he had made in reference to her office space. During the meeting arguments arise when John told Krista about his decision. John clearly did not consult with her. Krista was upset and she became a little bit unprofessional in the way she responded to John. It clearly shows how two individuals have different work ethics and how one decision can lead to emotions taking over. Krista had no option …show more content…

He should have identified if there was going to be any problems or any frictions in making such decision. “A decision is a choice made from available alternatives” (Daft 220). John should have looked at any alternatives or consult with Krista to come up with solutions. “Decision making involves effort both before and actual choice” (Daft 220). If he would have analyzed the situation before approaching the way he did, it would not have escalated to an argument. He was already determined and there was no way to make him think differently. I think the way he solved it was wrong, especially for Krista when she had no choice or input in the …show more content…

That was unprofessional. It is always important that no matter the situation you maintain professionalism and your emotions in check. She should have stated her disagreement. She should have tried to convince John to allow her to have additional time to come up with some alternatives. Then, if he did not agree with the alternatives provided, at least, she had the chance to voice her Team. Also, she should request another meeting with John and apologize for her behavior. She should have a mature professional conversation and should try to ask for a chance to provide any course of action to deviate John’s decision. If John decision was final, she should communicate that she will fully support his decision. Additionally, she should work on a contingency plan for her office in the event that budget cuts increase. This will better prepare her Team. Furthermore, upon return to her office, she needs to brief her Team on the decision made. Find a way to execute Johns decision without undermining him because she is a team player and she fully supports

Open Document