Japanese Culture Dbq

836 Words2 Pages

Imagine about four-hundred years ago, in present day Europe, a civilization arose. It was split into many chunks of land, called kingdoms, which contained even smaller communities inside them, called manors. In this manor many men, called knights, had just returned from war covered in poop, mud, blood, and many other disgusting things. This mess was cleaned up by a squire, aspiring to be a knight himself one day, that had to go through rigorous and dirty training to achieve his goal. Halfway across the world another civilization, in present day Japan, somewhat like Europe, doesn’t have children do their work for them. Instead, adult workers clean the clothes of their warriors, called samurai. Although weren’t as similar as you thought, in fact, …show more content…

Japan’s education system was based off of their religion and everything that was Europe had something to do with their religion. But there were still even more differences to be had about religion. First of all, they had completely different religious practices. Zen-Buddhism, the religion of Japan, was taught to trainees in a samurai training school. They taught the trainees to keep inner-peace whilst on the battlefield (Document C). This example shows that Japan directed most of their religion into their education system. Japan used their schools to teach their religion to children at a young age, but pages were taught at an even younger age. Peasants that wanted to be a knight would have to become a page at the age of four or five. Pages were taught to receive religious instruction and how to fight. At the age of about fourteen a page became a squire, who was taught to show mercy if asked (Document C). This shows that Europe incorporates most of their religion, Christianity, into the battlefield. This civilization taught children, aspiring to be knights to incorporate religion into their decisions on the battlefield. The different codes was very influenced by religion …show more content…

A samurai’s armor was very different from a knight’s armor. A samurai’s armor was made of small iron scales and leather. Having small plates of iron bound to leather made the armor flexible and light, whilst still being almost as strong as a knight’s armor. The downside being that if this armor got wet it would become very heavy (Document D). This shows how well crafted the armor was and it’s usefulness in a battle. A samurai’s armor was much better than a knight’s armor. A knight’s armor was a completely metal plated suit of armor. It was really hard to move in because of its weight of forty to sixty pounds. If a knight fell of his horse on the battlefield then he would be dead because he wouldn’t be able to get up. The knight’s suit of armor was so heavy he had to have his squire put his suit of armor on and take it off (Document D). This shows that this suit of armor was as much inconvenient as it was convenient. The two fighter’s armor both have their disadvantages and their

Open Document