Taking Sides: Inclusion
According to Stout (2001) the concept of inclusion can be differentiated into mainstreaming, inclusion and full inclusion each describing the amount of time special education students become part of a normal education classes. “Inclusion is a term which expresses the commitment to educate each child, to the maximum extent possible, in the school and classroom he or she would otherwise attend” (definitions section, para. 2). This commitment is based on the belief that special needs students would profit from the regular classroom environment (Noll, 2014, p. 225). According to Stout (2001) research based evidence supports this belief as “Recent meta-analyses confirm a small to moderate beneficial effect of inclusion education on the academic and social outcome of special needs students” (Research section, para. 3).
When forming co-teaching partnerships, teachers should discuss their education philosophies. In order for co-teaching to be effective in an inclusion setting, teachers must be on the same page. Co-teachers should discuss their philosophies on teaching, assessment, and discipline. By discussing goals and expectations ahead of team, there is a lower chance of misunderstanding and conflict (Conderman, 2012). Prior to beginning the school year, both co-teachers must be aware of how all students will be graded and reasons for changes in the grading system should be discussed. A students with a disability in a co-taught classroom may receive an individualized grading system. This individualized grading system should base his or her progress on assessments on progress made towards meeting individualized education plan objectives, improvement over the last school year, and effort (Conderman, 2012). When special education teachers and general education teachers are willing to share their responsibilities, it ensures that students suffering from a disability receives the necessary assessment accommodations, teaching modifications, and grading adaptations they need in order to succeed (Conderman, 2012). When two teachers are willing to collaborate and form a unified partnership, all students in the classroom can succeed. Students without a disability are going to make improvements, as well as those students with disabilities. When two qualified teachers are in a classroom, the student to teacher ratio becomes lower. Students are able to receive additional assistance when needed.
What do we do with children with disabilities in the public school? Do we include them in the general education class with the “regular” learning population or do we separate them to learn in a special environment more suited to their needs? The problem is many people have argued what is most effective, full inclusion where students with all ranges of disabilities are included in regular education classes for the entire day, or partial inclusion where children spend part of their day in a regular education setting and the rest of the day in a special education or resource class for the opportunity to work in a smaller group setting on specific needs. The need for care for children with identified disabilities both physical and learning continues to grow and the controversy continues.
Inclusion has shown that students with and without disabilities can learn together and have a positive effect on one another. Justice, L. M., Logan, J. R., Lin, T., & Kaderavek, J. N. in 2014, proving that students with and without disabilities can learn in the same classroom. The study examined a large population and findings can be generalized to a predictor for all Special Education programs. 85% of the students without disabilities met the criterion for cut-off and only 50% of the students with IEP’s met the criterion cut-off on the Descriptive Pragmatics Profile (DPP) during the spring semester. On average there was an 8 point gain. Knowing that large language gains can be made for all children is supportive and promising of current literature/theories
I have always had a negative opinion of inclusion classrooms because I feel they set up both the special education and regular education students for failure or at least not maximum success. At the secondary level, inclusion becomes more and more difficult because of the fast pace, content, and weak basic skills, while at the elementary level teachers can focus on both academic and social issues and content is not as high-stakes (Casale-Giannola, 2012).
After reading chapter one from the text and researching this week’s discussion topic, it became clear how important inclusion is for all students, not just those with disabilities. There is still a debate on how full inclusion should be implemented in schools and classrooms, along with if students with more severe disabilities needing more support should be within general education classrooms. Another big question would be if all students’ needs will be met in fully inclusive classrooms and can the development of learning in natural environments and least restrictive environments be achieved? What is stated by federal would be a fair answer to many of these questions, as stated on IDEA’s website:
Inclusion is a way to get students with disabilities a way to increase their critical thinking skills as well as their communication skills. Finally, inclusion gives both the special needs student and the general education students the opportunity to interact in a more natural and realistic setting. It is important that children need to understand and to accept the fact that all individuals are different and unique. They also need to understand that each of us deserves to be accepted for who he or she is regardless of the differences. (Brown, 1997)
Inclusion has improved students feelings of self esteem and confidence. No longer are these students labeled “special ed,” and no longer will these students not have faith in...
Over many years there has been issues regarding placement of special education students. Determined by which environment is the most effective learning setting is to either place a student into full inclusion general education classes or if he or should be placed in a “continuum of alternative settings” (O’Leary, 2016). As stated in O’Leary (2016), general education teachers and special education teacher’s work together to meet the students need when placed in a general education setting. This setting benefits the student social interactions with peers, but also incorporates the necessary services needed (O’Leary, 2016). Students do not want to seem like an outsider or someone who is “special” so this placement setting makes students feel more
...It provides a positive thinking toward the students with disabilities. The training of teachers plays a major role in this whole network of inclusion education. There are no hard and fast rule or solution to inclusion and dealing with students with disabilities. The support of school leaders and teachers are critical to create a conducive environment for students with disabilities. Ultimately, inclusion education targets students with disabilities to be inclusive in the social context for life long learning to take place. This skill will bring them further in life to handle crisis and they will not be defeated by the circumstances or failures. Teachers need to be empowered with skills and confidences to engage students with special needs. The support from school system also empowers them so that their attention on planning and crafting curriculum will be more focus.