Hurricane Katrina Paper

1501 Words4 Pages

The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina brought about significant social, political, and economic shifts in New Orleans, especially for certain underprivileged groups. I will be discussing how two papers—“Why Katrina's Victims Aren't Refugees: Musings on a ‘Dirty’ Word” by Adeline Masquelier and “Who Dat?: Race and Its Conspicuous Consumption in Post-Katrina New Orleans” by Marc D. Perry—both deal with these developments. More specifically, I will discuss how they each examine the concept of “otherness” in New Orleans within the context of Hurricane Katrina. These two articles are similar in that they both delineate certain groups in New Orleans that are considered “other” by those in power (and are essentially talking about the same group), and describe similar ways in how the “other” are dealt with; they are different in that Perry’s article focuses on the changes post-Katrina, while Masquelier’s article uses Katrina to show how previous institutions were amplified. The original article, “Who Dat?: Race and Its Conspicuous …show more content…

The Perry article shows the distinction between the cultures of black New Orleanians and white New Orleanians, how one was exploited for profit, and how certain groups were judged on their abilities/functions in society and placed into two categories—useful or expendable—based on their being African American. In Masquelier’s article, she emphasizes that the victims were attempting to cling to the categories as part of their identities when everything else they had known had been swept away. This was part of the reason they rejected the term “refugee.” They felt that it was not part of their identity, and that being classified as such stripped them of their culture and specific history (Masquelier, 2006). In both cases, the classification of these groups based on certain categories was instrumental in making them the “other” in

Open Document