Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Much like beauty, humor is in the eye of the beholder and much like most people would like to be considered beautiful, most people would like to be considered funny. There is no book you can read to become beautiful, but there exists however, a formula which humorists, such as David Sedaris, utilize to connect with audiences and evoke laughter. Humor is an effective tool which can be employed to quickly get past personal, religious and cultural bias. Sedaris employs literary tools in his short story “Jesus Shaves” in order to entertain but most importantly address delicate religious believes in a non-confrontational way. Perhaps the most effective literary tool which Sedaris employs is imagery. Sedaris sets the stage for the reader by painting a vivid mental picture of the French class in which the story takes place. Sedaris describes the physical attributes “… a pouty, plump Moroccan woman…” (Sedaris 415) as well personality “By the end of her first day, she'd raised her hand so many times, her shoulder had given out. “ (Sedaris 415) of fellow students. Sedaris provides details to the reader about the textbook and class discussion. …show more content…
The object was to match the holiday with the corresponding picture.” (Sedaris 415) Sedaris goes as far as to illustrate the teacher’s hands motions when she tries clarify the meaning of rabbit “The teacher…positioned her index fingers on top of her head, wiggling them as though they were ears. “ (Sedaris 415) This level of detail establishes Sedaris’ credibility and a connection with the reader which then adds credence to the story and his point of
where the author wants to become proficient in speaking French. He studies language instructions only to end up being embarrassed by the teacher. This results to him being more culturally confused. David Sedaris finds humor in situations that are humiliating.
David Sedaris, an American author from New York, in his piece “Me Talk Pretty One Day” uses humor and exaggeration to explore what it means to learn a foreign language. His piece transports us to a French course in France taught by a draconian woman. Sedaris uses many devices, particularly anti-climax and hyperbole to hook the reader to his storyline while also conveying his cardinal message. His carefully chosen literary devices effectively teach us about persistence and challenging our comfort zones through his traumatic and often humorous horror stories of being yelled at, and verbally abused by the “wild animal.”
Finally, within the syntax of the novel, Sedaris has interlocked various arguments together with the choice of his words. He skillfully crafts a very sarcastic and humorous piece through applying an argument that is intermingled with generalizations. Thus, it means that the syntax is direct and declarative. For instance, the author states that the teacher is exhausting him with her foolishness and is rewarding her efforts with barely anything but pain. However, the syntax that the author used in some parts of the essay can be said to be confusing because he is fond of changing the topics or employing a different approach of transition in order to make his point of view clear to the readers. This is evident because at some point of the story, he would insert the earlier events or apply metaphors to describe a given occurrence.
In “Turkeys in the Kitchen,” an essay written by Dave Barry, humor is used as an aid to make a point about the usefulness of men after Women’s Liberation. “A Plague of Tics,” a personal narrative written by David Sedaris, uses a different kind of humor to explain the reasoning behind his behavior. Through these two essays and their author’s personal experiences, humor is presented as a device to captivate reader’s attention and declare the author’s intended meaning.
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
4. Sedaris language is beyond effective, his sentences are full of considedness and snobby comments. “When asked most people say my greatest asset is my skin, which glows it really does! I have to tie a sock over my eyes in order to sleep at night. Other’s like my eyes or my perfect ,gleaming teeth my thick head of hair or my imposing stature, but if you want my opinion, I think my most outstanding feature is my ability to accept a compliment.” His conclusion to the story makes up for all the nonsense he had mentioned before.
By comparing their familial attractiveness, Sedaris makes it clear that in this life, he values not the relationship that he has with family, but qualities that family has given him. He has inherited a lot more than skull shape from his father, but he specifically chooses those words to emphasize his shallow interpretation of the meaning of family. This idea is further developed by a similar statement, in which Sedaris’ braggadocio further exemplifies this parental relationship. He continues his description of his family’s talents, by boasting “because we are so smart, my parents and I are able to see through people as if they were made of hard, clear plastic.” (1) In addition to putting value in the things his parents have given him, rather than the relationship they have, Sedaris’ diction borders on patronizing. He specifically uses the word “we” in order to subliminally
He is able to achieve his explicit purpose of telling the story of his experience learning the French language by using first person point of view, as well as by appealing heavily to ethos in doing this. By writing the essay as a first person narrative, Sedaris effectively tells his story as truth, and is also able to achieve his implicit purpose because he himself has overcome challenges in learning something new. Sedaris’s appeals to ethos work in the same way, in that they make him a credible speaker, which makes him effective in achieving his purposes. By using hyperbole and informal language, Sedaris creates a casual tone, which allows him to connect with his audience. This makes the essay more personal to each reader, and allows for a larger scope of readers, as it lacks academic vernacular. This is especially helpful in achieving the implicit purpose. Since Sedaris intends to convey that learning something new is filled with obstacles which must be overcome, one can infer that the text itself is directed at those who are likely to be learning new things; while this can be anyone in the world, the essay is most relatable to students. By using an informal tone, young people will find the essay more engaging, as well as easier to understand, which will allow them to derive a clear message from the
Green, Daniel. "A World Worth Laughing At: Catch-22 and the Humor of Black Humor." Studies
The document Youth and Entrapment in the French New Wave discusses that the educational culture which has a very big influence in the movie. Truffaut also displays the educational system in the movie which perfectly correlates with each other. In the movie the educational system is being displayed in several areas. The young boy Antoine had a picture of a girl in a bathing suit which was being passed throughout the boy’s class. Yet, the teacher catches Antoine and punishes him by making him stand behind the easel. Another example of the teacher disciplining Antoine is when the boy started writing on the easel which was a sign of protest and the teacher finds the poem he wrote. The teacher makes Antoine clean the easel and then gives him homework to write “I deface the classroom walls, and I mistreat French verse” in several tenses. Yet, the young boy has no time to finish this homework at home so he doesn’t go to school the next day. Therefore, he comes back to school the next day and tells the teacher that his mother died so he had to miss school the previous day but in reality he didn’t have time to finish the homework. He is succumbing to lying to the teacher in order to not get in trouble for missing school for a day. An example where the French educational system contributes to the movie is when Antoine turns in a paper by Balzac,
Satire is commonly a form of comedy that is usually humorous, but sometimes it can be seen as not humorous because of the topic the person is satirizing. Satirists would bring out the flaws of commonly sensitive topics such as religion; though it is difficult identifying religious truth in a society because what is considered the truth is always debated by different groups. George Carlin was incredibly outspoken about his views on religion. He used his personal beliefs to create a comedic routine to share to and inform the world about the hidden imperfections of popular subjects. Because Carlin was known for outing this sensitive topic, it may not be seen as humorous to those who feel a connection to the subject, in this case religious people.
One of the major revolving themes throughout the collection is the relationship between Sedaris and language. This relationship represents his obstacle of speech impairment in his childhood in Go Carolina and his French language class in Jesus Shave which emphasize Sedaris’s inability to conform to or use the language spoken by the people around him. It played an important role of presenting Sedaris as someone who is outcast and different
Psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists study humor because it is a fundamental culture value, but they still can’t determine why certain things make some people laugh and others not. There are “humor quotient” tests that are designed to measure an individual’s sense of humor, but these tests are questionable. These tests aren’t accurate because almost all humor depends on cultural background knowledge and language skills. Not every person in the whole world, or even in one country share the same background knowledge and skills, therefore they cannot have the same type of humor. “The fact remains that individuals vary in their appreciation of humor” (Rappoport 9). Since humor varies from individual to individual, humor lies in the individual. How successful or funny a joke is depends on how the person receives the joke, humor cannot be measured by a statistical
society with his own sense of humor, but however it still leaves a very good
If there is one way to bring a smile to someone’s face, it is laughter. Funny jokes, comical stunts, sarcasm- Every person is different when it comes to what makes them laugh. Some find dry humor comical. Others think sarcasm or joke-filled ranting are the best. ‘Comedy’ is such a broad term, broad enough to allow everyone to find something they find comical. In fact, ‘comedy’ includes a specific type of drama, one where the protagonist is joyful and happy endings are expected. Comedy is like a drug; it allows you to escape reality. When we say the word ‘comedy’ in the present, we are generally referring to a type of performance which provides humor. However, in its broadest sense, comedy has only one purpose: comedy makes people smile and