More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of a transactional model of communication
Rhetoric in a day to day example
Rhetoric in a day to day example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Speech Analysis: Teach every child about food
Jamie Oliver is a renowned culinary chef who is creating a remarkable movement by improving Americans’ cooking habits. Oliver plans to educate them the things they are eating are unhealthy and hoping to get them back in the kitchen. United States is the number one country that is facing Obesity causing increases in diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and other lifestyle diseases. Throughout his speech he uses the transactional model to get his message across the audience. Oliver made sure his message got through by delivering a great speech with a good communication with the audience.
Having a good communication is the key to success whether you are
…show more content…
He displays charts, photographs, and videos to expanse his views. He used a chart to displays the causes of death in America and uses photographs of obese people to show how people are being affected by obesity. “ Just feeling really sad and depressed right now. But, you know, I want my kids to succeed in life and this isn't going to get them there. But I'm killing them.”(Stacy) Oliver shows a video of a woman who is not only killing herself but her kids too. Oliver uses a wheelbarrow full of sugar to show how much sugar was in American schools milk. Oliver states, “Don't get me wrong, I support milk but someone at the milk board probably paid a lot of money for some geezer to work out that if you put loads of flavorings, colorings and sugar in milk, more kids will drink it.” (Oliver) He first scoops the amount of sugar a child consumes in one week then moves on to a month where he throws the entire wheelbarrow over the floor. He ends the demonstrate by saying, “Now, I don't know about you guys, but judging the circumstances, right, any judge in the whole world, would look at the statistics and the evidence, and they would find any government of old guilty of child abuse. That's my belief.”(Oliver) The audience is amazed by this as we can tell by them applauding. The use of visual helped Oliver get his message across his audience very …show more content…
The speaker of course was Jamie Oliver and the audience was Americans who needed to open their eyes to reality. He was very sourceful to his receivers because he was prepared and proved his point of views with reliable evidence. He started this whole movement due to the context that US was the number country fighting obesity. He understood the circumstance America was facing and pointed out them throughout his speech such a schools and fast food industries. Before even starting to present, Oliver had to do a lot of research and decode all of the information he was going to use. He interpreted the message into his own understanding by saying how it everyone knew at least 10 recipes they would have a better chance to eat healthy. The audience encoded all of his information every well and we could tell as we viewed the video by seeing them laughing and clapping. Encoding and decoding was being done by the speaker and the audience. The speaker knew when to pause and stop to see if he has all of the audience on the same page by seeing them applause and the audience decoded all the information by interpreting it in their everyday lives such as feeding their kids sugar. Noise was kept away throughout this speech so the speaker can be heard properly by the audience staying quiet as Oliver spoke.In addition, Jamie made sure his audience heard the video properly and could
...lly has a critic. To strengthen the arguments and persuade viewers to their side of the debate, film makers tend to present only one side of the story. Specific placement of an object, the choice of words and the selection of scenes are possible elements that could be woven into documentaries to shape viewers’ perspectives on certain issues. Fat Head is a great case in point, which is likely to convert some public opinion about the ideology of healthy eating. Documentaries may contain biases that mislead the viewers; presenting ‘facts’ but perhaps not revealing the entire picture. Therefore, in a sense, documentaries can be truthful, but also fallacious. It is imperative to evaluate the techniques used in documentaries, in order to distinguish readily from what is fantasy. It could be concluded that Fat Head and Super Size Me are two version of the same reality.
...g statistics about the public’s health and make the future seem bleak, “the lifespan is shortening for new American children” (Pastor) and “ one in three children born after the year 2010 will develop type II diabetes” (Pastor). Pastor says that he is shocked by the impact and wants to break away from the cycle created. In his closing statements he convinces the audience to break away from the cycle away as well, by drawing on the seeds he planted with pathos, ethos, and logos. The film was well made and addressed all the issues of “organic” food and well informed the audience of what is occurring. Next time, an audience member goes to the supermarket to buy food they will probably remember what their children will look like in twenty years if they don’t take a more “organic” approach to their lives.
...ocessed, un-chewable food from their childhood. Pastor uses logos best by providing to the viewers many facts that support his point of view. These facts ranged from effects on the human body to the environment, all supporting that organic food is healthy. Ethos was also used effectively by incorporating interviews with professionals. Pastor was able to gain respect and authority because he has done his research on the topic. Lastly, pathos was used in the documentary to appeal to the emotions of the audience. Pastor accomplishes this by interviewing people who have touching stories involving the issue of healthy eating. Pastor effectively uses rhetorical technique to convince the audience that organic food is the healthy choice, leaving the viewers with only one thought to consider: Why not go organic?
Throughout the film, various companies are exposed for promoting products in a manner that depicts the products as a healthy alternative. The ultimate exposing is done on the government and the USDA. The government is exposed for making deals with food companies to not demonize companies that sell unhealthy food. Even Michelle Obama 's "Let 's Move" campaign against childhood obesity started out bringing unhealthy companies to the light but died down by emphasizing exercise and not talking about food. This is largely in part due to a deal made with major corporations who weren’t too pleased with the original approach of “Let’s Move”.
He uses personal appeal, or the pathos method. One of the very first examples he uses is the personal statement about his good friend Gabby Giffords. She was a congresswoman who was shot in a mass shooting in Arizona. He states, “I was there with Gabby when she was still in the hospital, and we didn’t necessarily at that point think she was going to survive.” When he makes this statement, he is really trying to show how guns can affect anyone in the world at anytime. He is trying to make the point that he has dealt with this matter on a personal level to try and reach out to a certain area of his audience, which are people that have been affected personally by firearms. He tries to touch home to people to get them to listen. He brings up the event of Sandy Hook Elementary by stating “And that’s what we tried to change three years ago, after 26 Americans—Including 20 children, were
President Barack Obama has been a well-known political figure for just over 8 years; he has served two terms as the President of the United States. There has been controversy surrounding the first African American president, after his first term Obama failed to prove to America that he would fix all the things he promised to fix upon election. With his second term he has set in place his views and goals for the country. Obama’s views have been trying to benefit the overall population of American, from the poor all the way to the rich with a few subclasses in-between. During the Inauguration of his second term, won against Mitt Romney. His opponent stood for many things that were conflicting to Obamas platform, while Obama stood for rehabilitating the poor after the recession, Romney wanted to focus on tax breaks for the rich. Throughout the speech given by President Barack Obama, he outlines necessary changes in the system to benefit the people and the need for people to come together as one to have an effective country.
Martin Luther King Jr’s most compelling point was that every person has the same rights
In a society that is facing numerous problems, such as economic devastation, one major problem is often disregarded, growing obesity. As the American society keeps growing, so does growth of the fast food industry and the epidemic of obesity. In order to further investigate the main cause of obesity, Morgan Spurlock, the film director and main character, decides to criticize the fast food industry for its connection with obesity in America. In his documentary Spurlock performs a radical experiment that drives him to eat only from McDonald's and order a super-sized meal whenever he is asked. By including visual and textual techniques, rhetorical appeals, and argumentative evidences, Morgan Spurlock was able to help viewers know the risks of fast food and how it has caused America to be the world's “fattest country”.
Wendell Berry write is From What Are People For? Essay the article “The Pleasure of Eating” about what people eat and how much knowledge they have have on what they eat. Berry want to explain how we need to change our eating habit and where we buy our food from. Berry goes on how we need to eat an says “Eat Responsibly” is they way we need to think about what we put in our stomach. Berry also talk about how much advertising has influence our decision of what to buy at the grocery store, He claims that we are passive customer and the ignorance of food history. She also gives us seven ways to change our habit and eat more “responsible”. Some of the solution that she explains is that to participate in food production, prepare your own food, learn
Cesar Chavez published an article in a religious magazine on the tenth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s death. Chavez’s message is delivered with a humble yet serious tone, as he shows compassion in his writing to emphasize his purpose, which is to bring attention to the importance of non-violent acts over violent acts, and to overall strive to gain the support of his audience, which generally those devoted to helping those in need. The persona of the author helps the audience create a stronger connection with and be further persuaded by Chavez because the audience can infer that he has experienced and is a strong supporter himself of nonviolence by the use of his examples and his points of view. By using rhetorical strategies such
Comedian Jon Stewart gives a speech on the Daily Show during the “Rally to Restore Sanity/Fear”. He wants the viewers of the Daily Show to realize the difference between the real and fake threats and to take a humorous perspective on most of America’s “problems”. Stewart also emphasizes to his audience not to take every person on the media by his word and not to overreact to everything they hear. He uses metaphors, comparisons, and hypothetical examples to get his point across.
The emotional feel or atmosphere created by the documentary was just trying to help. You could tell that they want to help people and make sure they are all healthy and can live the right lifestyle. While watching this film I encountered many things I found questionable. I found three claims to be bias/ controversial in this documentary: it uses correlation as causation, they claim someone having health issues can be solved by cutting meat out of their diet, and lastly they only use one study to prove their method, and it is the one that one of the main people in the movie made.
Environmental advocate and cofounder of Eatingliberally.org, Kerry Trueman, in her response to Stephen Budiansky’s Math Lessons for Locavores, titled, The Myth of the Rabid Locavore, originally published in the Huffington Post, addresses the topic of different ways of purchasing food and its impact on the world. In her response, she argues that Budiansky portrayal of the Local Food Movement is very inaccurate and that individuals should be more environmentally conscious. Trueman supports her claim first by using strong diction towards different aspects of Budinsky essay, second by emphasizes the extent to which his reasoning falls flat, and lastly by explaining her own point with the use of proper timing. More specifically, she criticizes many
I fully support this documentary and everything it shows; it can lead to a healthier future and Americans should use this opportunity to make a healthier tomorrow. Super-Size Me gives a detailed look behind the scenes at the biggest fast food chain in the world, and gives the audience a cautionary look at the future. Works Cited Super Size Me. Dir. Morgan Spurlock.
This book is a life changing book. It was inspirational, informative and gave you insight about the things we do not know about the food we eat. The documentary was graphic and detailed, informing you of the process from the farm or the fields, to the manufactures, to the labeling and packaging companies. It informed me, about the school lunches, how some of the meals at school are made, to the politics behind it. This book is also a collectible.