Prescriptive Theories In The Case Of The Mann Gulch Wildfire

1599 Words4 Pages

Mann Gulch The Mann Gulch wildfire was a tragic event that took the lives of 13 firefighters who had jumped into the area to battle the fast-moving fire. The tragedy was a severe hit to the Forest Service, which had not experienced a death during a decade of smoke jumping (Rothermel, 1993). Along with the horrific deaths, Rothermel (1993) states the Mann Gulch fire had serious consequences for the Forest Service and its research branch. The fire disaster changed the landscape of wildfire firefighting. Due to the tragedy, the Forest Service would establish new training techniques and improved safety measures for its firefighters and smokejumpers along with more emphasis on fire research and the science of fire behavior (Lehman, 2009). With the training and research, better firefighting techniques and equipment evolved (Lehman, 2009). The analysis will evaluate how the firefighters …show more content…

With the prescriptive/normative theory, it is a theory about how decisions should be made. According to Border (2013), normative decision theory tries to answer the question of how can good decisions be made without good information. In addition, the normative model factors in the fact leaders are bound by certain limitations when making decisions such as personal and environmental factors that reduce rationality, such as time, complexity, uncertainty and resources (Decision-making, n.d.). This description seems to be the case in the Mann Gulch disaster. The leader started his decision-making based on what he knew and what should be made. Though Dodge was greatly wrong to the extent of the fire, he based his decisions on the environmental factors with time being a huge factor. Dodge and his crew went into the situation with a set mind frame of what the wildfire should have been and then had to vary his decisions on the go with the factors that were presented to

Open Document