How Is Drummond Inherit The Wind Admirable

686 Words2 Pages

The story, Inherit the Wind, has helped readers realize that “Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in” (Asimov). This is clearly shown though the prejudice that Drummond had to face throughout the story. Drummond was to defend Darwin’s Theory in a highly religious town. This exposed Drummond to unreasonable judgement since the town was not open-minded to new opinions. His positive character traits, hidden by the author due to the setting, are subject to the comprehension of the readers ability to see between the lines. In doing so, one can clearly see that he is an admirable character. Drummond is admirable, as shown in Inherit the Wind, for his open-mindedness and respect …show more content…

It makes one seem inviting and have a high regard for things. This is especially true when examining Drummond. He believes that everyone should have the right to express their thoughts, regardless of what it is. For example, after Hornbeck mocks Brady’s religion with inbelicic jokes, Drummond responds with “You have no more right to spit on his religion than you have a right to spit on my religion! Or my lack of it!” (Lawrence and Lee (page number)). Although Drummond and Brady had different beliefs, especially during the trial, Drummond found it unacceptable for Hornbeck to shame Brady’s religion for it. Drummond knew he should be respected, regardless of what his religious beliefs are. One can clearly see that his respect towards Brady makes him admirable because it tells the readers that he open-minded towards opinions he may disagree with. Secondly, Drummond is an admirable character because he believes in equality. For instance, when Hornbeck mocks Brady for his religion again, after his death, Drummond responds with “Brady has the same right as Cates, the right to be wrong!” (Lawrence and Lee (page number)). Drummond saw both Cates and Brady as equal and gave both the same platform in order to express their beliefs. This shows how Drummond had respect for Brady because he did not put his bias views on what is right or wrong. Although he is described as a “sinner” or “godless man,” one can see that Drummond …show more content…

This is especially true when comparing it to Drummond. He is able to see different opinions in unbiased view, which allows him to progressively expand his knowledge, rather than sticking to one opinion. For example, when Brady asked Drummond on why his mindset had changed so drastically, Drummond responds with “All motion is relative. Perhaps it is you who have moved away-by standing still.” (Lawrence and Lee (page number)). Although Drummond reveals himself as a religious man, it is clear that he is able to expand and progress his opinions as time progresses. On the other hand, Brady is extremely hidebound and is unable to open to new opinions, claiming that god speaks to him. This character trait of being open-minded makes Drummond admirable because the reader is able to step in the shoes of Drummond and realize how much he exposes himself to new material and learn more. This is evidently shown in the play when the court case ended, and Drummond takes Darwin’s Theory of evolution in one hand and “the Bible in his other hand...balancing them thoughtfully, as if his hands were scales” (Lawrence and Lee 129). This shows his open-minded behaviour because one can clearly see that he does not favor one over the other, but rather sees both as worthy enough for debate. Using his hands as scales shows his consideration for both views as equal. This makes Drummond an

Open Document