How Is Charlie Gordon Successful In Flowers For Algernon

1646 Words4 Pages

Have you ever questioned what intelligent was? Many people wish they could be more intelligent. If you could change your intelligence, would you? In the short story “Flowers For Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, the main character, Charlie Gordon, was given the opportunity to undergo an operation that increases his low IQ for a short period of time. Charlie made the decision to go through with the operation in order to experience a more intellectual life; Charlie had always wanted to be smarter, and this was his chance to live out his dream. Charlie’s life and struggles throughout “Flowers for Algernon” can be equated to the plot of “The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato. As we follow the escapee prisoner in “The Allegory of the Cave” we realize that …show more content…

While being a genius Charlie tried to find an error in the conclusion that he would start to deteriorate. Charlie finds out that he indeed will start to regress because through his studies he learned that the hypothesis was wrong, so in a letter to his doctors Charlie says, “I am grateful for the little bit that I here add to the knowledge of the function of the human mind and of the laws governing the artificial increase of human intelligence” (Keyes 239). This means that though he is sad he will regress Charlie is grateful that he got to contribute to the study of artificial increase of human intelligence at all. In “The Allegory of the Cave” the freed prisoner goes back to share what he’s learned with the other prisoners and bring them out of the darkness and into the light because “...don’t you think he would consider himself lucky because of the transformation that had happened and, by contrast, feel sorry for them?”(Plato 5). Charlie also felt pity for others like him; as the prisoner in the allegory also did. This is just like how Charlie wanted his work to bring other people like him out of the darkness and into the light. Even if this meant that Charlie himself would never return to the light he would still be grateful to pull others out of the darkness. Charlie showed that though this experiment was a failure, it could help scientists with the study of intellect in the future. Charlie helped the doctors discover what went wrong in the surgery, so that future experiments might be more successful. Future doctors could possibly make the operation better because of Charlie’s discovery. Charlie’s persistence and determination throughout this entire process are what really made him a good subject for the experiment. If someone else had been the subject they might not have had the same experience as Charlie, and

Open Document