Hockey Fan Subculture

1171 Words3 Pages

For my presentation, I focused on Hockey Fans as a subculture. My main idea was to question and see if the fans of hockey qualified as a subculture. One way of doing this was to look at Gelder’s six logics that we have discussed in class. The two that I focused on were territory and excess and exaggeration. Although hockey fans are all over the world, particularly Europe and North America, they have specific areas they tend to stay around, such as living rooms, hockey arenas, and sports bars. For the second of the two logics that Gelder mentions, I saw the exaggeration part obvious as many fans put face paint on when they watch hockey games, this is particularly the case when you go to a game at an arena. You want to show your support and sometimes …show more content…

The different levels of hockey, such as minors, professional (like Quebec Major Junior Hockey League, QMJHL, National Hockey League, NHL), and Olympics. Each of these levels have fans and each to a different degree of extremes, when it comes to fans. The fans who are really obsessed would be those who cannot miss a game and often show their fandom to everyone. Where the levels of fandom play out in such a unique way, I wondered whether or not the fans of hockey would be considered a weekend or evening subculture. Especially, where the games usually take place in the evening or on the weekend. It is definitely something to consider when looking at sports fans because of the timing of games and of how fans show their support to a …show more content…

One thing that stood out to me was how everyone thought of sports fans differently. For example, Haenfler breaks his cultures down into a table and each category in that table he has listed the types of cultures that he feels, from research, best fit under these categories. He argues that fan culture is where sports fans fit and not under subculture. Whereas, in the other document I previously referenced, they argue it is apart of subculture depending on your definitions that you use. This document also states that, when looking at sports fans, you should consider whether their career choices affect their status within that subculture. An example of this was brought up in class, is Don Cherry apart of the subculture? And it is an interesting question because, yes, he is fan, but because of his career choices to be a coach, then a broadcaster for hockey, should he still be apart of the subculture? Where so much of his life was spent being involved in hockey related activities or jobs you could argue that he is no longer apart of that subculture, but just a well known public figure. Because he is so well known to the public and even mainstream people, (those who are not really fans, but they know who he is), he really is not apart of the subculture anymore. Often subculture is looked at as not being

Open Document