During the introduction scene of Henry V, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Ely along with the nobles are all sitting together in a large, poorly lit room expressing concern about a new bill that has been brought up for the consideration of King Henry. Canterbury and Ely don’t want the king to pass this bill into law because it would authorize the government to take away a great deal of the church’s land and money. The money would be used to maintain the army, support the poor, and supplement the king’s treasury.
In the middle of their discussion, King Henry enters. As the doors open, the lighting is very dark so you cannot see the king’s face at all. As King Henry approaches, his body becomes more apparent and visible due to the fact that the lighting improves the closer he gets to the other men. King Henry sits on his throne
…show more content…
King Henry is shot alone when making the important decision to go to battle with the French so that you can really focus in on every one of his different facial expression so that the audience can tell that King Henry is very angry at the French King for sending him tennis balls as a taunt towards Henry. Also, King Henry is shot alone when giving his famous speeches right before each battle he partaken in like the battle of Harfleur and the battle of Agincourt to rile up his troops so that they may fight at their full capability. On the other hand King Henry is shot with others when making other important decisions like the execution of the three soldiers who were plotting to kill King Henry but did not realize that King Henry had already known about their diabolical plan. Also the decision to hang Bardolph after he stole a pax from the local church and was spotted doing so by another soldier. Captain Fluellen confronted Henry about what the verdict was on Bardolph and asked him if that was what should be done, and King Henry
“The key factor in limiting royal power in the years 1399-1509 was the king’s relationship with parliament.”
Henry’s speech to Virginia uses several tactics to get your attention; the stress at the time was overwhelming as the pressure from Britain to dissemble and succumb intensified. “It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country.” His intention behind involving God and religion
training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was
The first appeal that Henry uses in his speech is ethos which appeals to ethics. Evidence from the text is, “fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country” (lines 13-14). This shoes that God has credibility. It also shows that you need to respect God over Britain. The next piece of evidence that I found in the speech is whenever the text said, “…and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings” (lines 16-17). This is saying that you should respect God above man. That is two ways how Henry used the ethical appeal, ethos.
The father and son relationship is one of the most important aspects through the youth of a young man. In Shakespeare’s play Henry IV, he portrays the concept of having "two fathers". King Henry is Hal’s natural father, and Falstaff is Hal’s moral father. Hal must weigh the pros and cons of each father to decide which model he will emulate. Falstaff, who is actually Hal’s close friend, attempts to pull Hal into the life of crime, but he refuses.
Prince Hal, to be focused and intense. King Henry is the first to speak and
Henry IV is a play that concerns itself with political power and kingship in English history. References to kingship are prevalent throughout the play, especially in the depiction of the characters. Although most of the characters in this play could teach us about kingship, I would like to focus my attention to Prince Henry. I think that this character helps us to best understand what kingship meant at this particular time in history.
But in scene 1 we meet the common characters. These would have been the sort of people that Henry would of socialised with when he was younger. This is a huge contrast to which Henry is during scene 2.As he is very serious and cunning.
Clarke, Peter. "Canterbury as the New Rome: Dispensations and Henry VIII's Reformation." The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 64, no. 1 (2013): 20-44.
... glance into Peasants and the Church, as the King did have authority over the land. It is clear, from reading “The Canterbury Tales,” that Chaucer did feel that the Catholic Church was a great institution which had established a hierarchy that could function well with the right people involved. He felt that many people, especially on a local level, were using their position to enrich themselves; the public be damned. He, for the most part did not criticize Rome or the Pope for the Church’s problems, with one major exception, the Crusades. I believe that the Knight’s introduction in the “General Prologue” spoke loudly against the Crusades. Overall, Chaucer’s criticism was with the local overreaching representatives of the Church, rather than the Church itself, which is why he treats the individuals with distain, but he criticizes the Church with a velvet glove.
Everyone has nights where they just cannot fall asleep because their minds are buzzing with life’s unanswered questions. In Shakespeare’s play Henry IV, Part II, King Henry questions why he, the king, is unable to sleep while his peasants are sound asleep. Shakespeare uses specific diction to enhance the tone and imagery in King Henry’s soliloquy as well as certain syntactical choices to display Henry’s mental state.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
The Canterbury Tales is a literary masterpiece in which the brilliant author Geoffrey Chaucer sought out to accomplish various goals. Chaucer wrote his tales during the late 1300’s. This puts him right at the beginning of the decline of the Middle Ages. Historically, we know that a middle class was just starting to take shape at this time, due to the emerging commerce industry. Chaucer was able to see the importance and future success of the middle class, and wrote his work with them in mind. Knowing that the middle class was not interested in lofty philosophical literature, Chaucer wrote his work as an extremely comical and entertaining piece that would be more interesting to his audience. Also, Chaucer tried to reach the middle class by writing The Canterbury Tales in English, the language of the middle class rather than French, the language of the educated upper class. The most impressive aspect of Chaucer’s writing is how he incorporated into his piece some of his own controversial views of society, but yet kept it very entertaining and light on the surface level. One of the most prevalent of these ideas was his view that certain aspects of the church had become corrupt. This idea sharply contrasted previous Middle Age thought, which excepted the church’s absolute power and goodness unquestionably. He used corrupt church officials in his tales to illustrate to his audience that certain aspects of the church needed to be reformed. The most intriguing of these characters was the Pardoner. Chaucer’s satirical account of the Pardoner is written in a very matter-of-fact manner that made it even more unsettling with his audience. Chaucer uses his straightforwardness regarding the hypocrisy of the Pardoner, suggestive physiognomy of the character, and an interesting scene at the conclusion of the Pardoner’s Tale to inculcate his views of the church to his audience. The way that Chaucer used these literary devices to subtly make his views known to an audience while hooking them with entertainment, shows that Chaucer was truly a literary genius.
King is full of grace and fair regard / And a true lover of the Holy
The Catholic Church has been a historically important entity with much control over how people lived during medieval times. In The Canterbury Tales Chaucer demonstrates how Church officials have come to abuse this power, excepting themselves from their own rules. There should be made mention that while most of the first estate is hypocritical not all of the church officials are wholly corrupt, leading the reader to believe that Chaucer supported the ideas of the Church, but did not support those in charge of enforcing those ideals.