Heart Of Darkness

2483 Words5 Pages

Heart of Darkness follows protagonist Charlie Marlow, a riverboat captain, as he relays the story of his time in the Congo to a group of men sitting around a camp fire. Marlow’s story revolves around his journey down the Congo River during the 1890s, and everything he experienced while there. The New Historicism lens lends itself particularly well to this text because of the various elements visible in it that were impacted by historical events. The economic, political, and social conditions of the Belgian Congo in the 1890s influenced the themes, characters, and narrative of the text, Heart of Darkness. Through these aspects of the time period reflected in the text, Conrad criticizes European Colonialism. The New Historicism Lens aims to …show more content…

In the 1890s, King Leopold was in control of the Congo, and claimed to have a humanitarian, civilizing plan for the people of the Congo, but instead used the control he had over the country for his own personal gain. By exploiting the Congolese people, he was able to collect ivory and rubber, which were then sent to Europe to be sold for profit. The rest of the world was unaware of this brutality at the time it was happening, and remained so until 1908, due to the secrecy of Leopold and the Belgian government. (“Leopold II, King”) In order to find out what was really going on in the Congo, a deeper look was needed. In the same way, readers of Heart of Darkness must look deeper into the text to find the real meaning. This text is told by an unnamed narrator, who is listening to Marlow tell his story of the time he spent in the Belgian Congo. The central story is not right on the surface, and must be found by looking further into the text. The reader has to take a few steps into the story in order to see what was happening. Working as a parallel to the deception of colonialism, this type of narrative shows the effects of the political aspects of the 1890s in the Congo. The narrative of Heart of Darkness was also used by Conrad to criticize King Leopold’s actions. Leopold put up a front to the rest of world, saying he had a great goal for the Congo, while …show more content…

Kurtz, who is the embodiment of Colonialism in the Congo. On the surface, Kurtz is a man who came to Africa to work for “The Company” and to help civilize the Congolese people; He was even asked by the International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs to write a report to help them with their future plans. This report was described by Marlow as amazing, but also that “‘There were no practical hints to interrupt the magic current of phrases, unless a kind of note at the foot of the last page...may be regarded as the exposition of a method. It was very simple and at the end of that moving appeal to every altruistic sentiment it blazed at you luminous and terrifying like a flash of lightning in a serene sky: ‘Exterminate all the brutes!’’” (Conrad 50) The last 4 words of this quote show Kurtz’s real goal in Africa - not to civilize or help the natives, but to get rid of them. In history, this is what King Leopold claimed to do (to help), but actually did (want to kill them off) as well. Additionally, Kurtz’s heritage parallels him to Belgian Colonialism. He is half English and half French, similar to how Belgium is right next to France and very close to England. The last connection between Kurtz and Belgian Colonialism is Kurtz’s deception in his job as an ivory collector. He is said, by his superiors, to be one of the best collectors for the entire company, an

Open Document