Hacksaw Ridge Thesis

672 Words2 Pages

Mel Gibson Film(s) Analysis

In Mel Gibson's recent Hacksaw Ridge, he is shown to have an eye for action and story depth like no other director. In the early stages of the film, it shows the life of Desmond Doss, whom is played by Andrew Garfield.
Gibson chooses a very sad entry point to the life of Desmond, showing him getting into a fight and the hardships of family life with an abusive father who had came back from war not long ago. The story takes a very heavy turn when Desmond meets the love of his life, Dorothy Shultchz who is a hospital nurse. Desmond sits by and watch all of his friends and family enlist into the current war (World War 2), and decides to enlist as his brother did. A critic from the IndieWire States “As he’s proven …show more content…

The pure ability to establish a connection between the viewer and the story, all depends on the actor’s performance shown in the film. Desmond is a conscientious objector, who does not believe in the act of firing bullets in the fog of war, only worrying about saving the lives of his men and protecting them from the Japanese onslaught that will occur on Hacksaw Ridge. Gibson’s ability to determine an actor’s performance, pre-film makes him a valuable director, almost outmatched in this category and deserves proper acknowledgement for it. Although in movies such as “Braveheart” he chooses himself as the lead role. In which case he thought he was the only one who could truly perform the vision in his head. Had turned out to be one of the greatest films of all time. Almost labeling Mel Gibson as the best, if not the second best director for his award winning …show more content…

Why should we give him another chance at being a phenomenal director? It is quite simple, everyone deserves a second chance at doing something. Gibson has came out and said the following “Ten years have gone by. I’m feeling good. I’m sober, all of that kind of stuff, and for me it’s a dim thing in the past. But others bring it up, which kind of I find annoying, because I don’t understand why after 10 years it’s any kind of issue. Surely if I was really what they say I was, some kind of hater, there’d be evidence of actions somewhere. There never has been . . . I’ve never discriminated against anyone or done anything that sort of supports that reputation. And for one episode in the back of a police car on eight double tequilas to sort of dictate all the work, life’s work and beliefs and everything else that I have and maintain for my life is really unfair.” obviously stating he does has moved on, passed all of his long forgotten issues in his head and moved on to greater things. If you happen to be a film critic, would you judge the film based on the director and his talents, or base it off issues and social media and remarks? Being biased, while going into a movie theatre to watch a film, is no good critic at all. Infact, good critics watch the moving based on performance and changes

Open Document