Guantanamo Detention Facility Research Paper

515 Words2 Pages

The Guantanamo detention facility has caused a major controversy between the White House and the Republican-Controlled Congress in recent years (Marshall 795). The upcoming election does not look hopeful in finding a resolution for this issue because both candidates completely disagree. Keeping Guantanamo open is not ideal for America’s financial, national security, or international relations interest; therefore, the facility should be shut down. The Guantanamo detention facility is expensive for the United States. It “costs the U.S. taxpayers $44 million a year” (Mora 809). Alternative solutions prove the prison to be uneconomical for U.S. taxpayers. The expense of running Guantanamo is excessive, and the money used for its operation could be used for improving security at U.S. federal prisons in preparation for Guantanamo detainees instead. Keeping American prisoners on foreign land has proven to be ineffective. Experts say “that many high-level terrorists have long been imprisoned on U.S. soil without incident (Marshall 797). Mr. Alberto J. Mora believes “the federal prison system has demonstrated that it can successfully and safely hold terrorists as dangerous as …show more content…

relationships with allies. When President Obama speaks with world leaders they bring up the fact that Guantanamo is not resolved (Marshall 795). These world leaders speak for countries that the United States needs on their side in the fight against terrorism. Important U.S. officials say “the prison not only fails to advance national security but also undermines it” (Marshall 795). This is due to the fact that “allies are less likely to share valuable intelligence with us” and that without confirmation that their prisoners will not be sent to Guantanamo, they are reluctant to send them to the U.S. (Marshall 798). Guantanamo may not directly affect the U.S. fight against terrorism, but closing it “would likely improve relations with allies” (Marshall

Open Document