In comparing the Epic of Gilgamesh to the Bible, we find many parallels when analyzing the book of Genesis and the story of the flood. The two works have the greatest similarities when comparing the main theme. They each tell about a hero who is told by gods that a massive flood with destroy earth. In both, vessels are built for protection again this fatal flood. However, when closely analyzed, one can see there are many differences in the smaller details.
In both works, a deity is unhappy with humanity. Enlil is angered, in the Epic of Gilgamesh, because “The uproar of mankind is intolerable and sleep is no longer possible by reason of the babel” The gods decide to punish mankind for making too much noise by sending a flood to kill all living things. Mankind had become so corrupt and evil in Genesis and this made God regret “making human beings on the earth, and his heart was grieved.” Therefore he decided to destroy man whom he created by means of a flood.
…show more content…
Noah is chosen directly by God in Genesis and Utnapishtim is chosen by Ea indirectly through a dream in the Epic of Gilgamesh. The ark built by Noah was rectangular and had three floors; “the length of the ark will be three hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits and its height thirty cubits.” Ea tells Utnapishtim to tear down his house and build a cubic bark and he builds it with about seven floors. Noah and Utnapishtim brought family and animals on the vessel. Utnapishtim bought craftsmen, jewels and other valueables along with him, in addition. This shows that God and Ea are giving the good in mankind a chance to
Gilgamesh, a Sumerian epic, is one of the oldest recorded narratives, yet it still holds relevance today. The epic is composed of 12 stone tablets that were discovered in 1853, and the ancient text lives in a state of flux with many different translations existing today. The text first entered the world stage only once George Smith published the portion of the text that related to the flood from the Hebrew bible. (Mosley Para. 64) The central character, Gilgamesh king of Uruk, is two parts god and one part man. He is handsome, brave, and strong but he is also boastful and filled with pride. He cares very little for his people and “does not leave a girl to her mother” (I, 65). Although he is ultimately perceived as a hero, Gilgamesh has more
There is much debate over the historical accuracy of the Hebrew Bible and The Epic of Gilgamesh. Some claim that to understand a work of literature requires extensive knowledge of the background of this work. The contrary position is that a work of literature can be interpreted solely on it’s content. The meaning of the term classical literature is that it can be applied during any period of time, it is eternal. Yet the conditions surrounding the author might still be of interest to the reader, and of importance to the work. As with many cases, the truth is somewhere in between the two extremes. Both sides have valid arguments about the importance of historicity.
Heidel, Alexander. The Gilgamesh Epic and Old Testament Parallels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.
The Odyssey and Gilgamesh are two great epics that show two heroes from two different time periods trying to find the meaning of life. In this paper, I would like to talk to you about the two epics and how they were both alike and different in some ways. Mainly I want to focus on the qualities they shared or didn 't, what the god 's roles were in the epics, and how death and immortality are observed in these epics.
The epic poems of Gilgamesh and Ovid’s Metamorphoses contain an almost uncanny resemblance in terms of certain events that take place within both works of literature. Within the poems, one may compare both interpretations of the flood in such a way that could make it difficult to discern their differences. However, despite how comparable the poems may seem, they do pose specific differences that separate them from one another. Although these poems are extremely similar in context, they share differences in terms of cause and effect. Along with this, one must take into account that these poems are separated by two millenniums, which could potentially be a factor. Regardless, the depictions of the flood in these works points to the historical
Post-modern writers usually used classical literature as a guideline when writing their novels, this was done to convey certain messages which made them have universal relevancy. This will be proven by considering the similarities and differences that Yossarian from Catch 22 has with Gilgamesh from The Epic of Gilgamesh. The focus will be on archetypal plots, characters and themes to prove that Yossarian is based on Gilgamesh.
The Gilgamesh Epic is an ancient Mesopotamian story about life and the suffering one must endure while alive. Included in the story, is a tale of a great flood that covered the earth, killing all but a select few of it’s inhabitants. This story of a great flood is common to most people, and has affected history in several ways. It’s presence in the Gilgamesh Epic has caused many people to search for evidence that a great flood actually happened. It has also caused several other religions and cultures to take the same basic story, claiming it for their own.
The Sumero-Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, after two and a half millennia of dormancy, was resurrected by British archaeologists in the nineteenth century. Amid the rubble of an Assyrian palace, the twelve clay tablets inscribed the adventures of the first hero of world literature – King Gilgamesh, whose oral folk tales go back to at least 3000 years before Christ (Harris 1). Tablet XI contains the story of the Flood. In this essay let us compare this flood account to the more recent Noah’s Flood account in Genesis of the Old Testament.
The rendition of the historic, worldwide Flood recorded in Genesis of the Old Testament is similar to the account recorded on Tablet 11of the Sumero-Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, discovered in the 1800’s by British archaeologists in Assyria. Let us compare the two in this essay.
Centuries ago, two books were written with similar and different ideas. The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Book of Job have different settings although they both discuss friendship, death and mortality, pain and suffering, and characters, but individually the book of Job examines where human beings stand in the world.
With the rediscovery of the ancient cities and the objects contained within we found clay tablets with curios markings. Slowly theses markings were recognized as writing and the script, in its various languages, was laboriously deciphered. In these tablets we find the epic of Gilgamesh. Although scholars have disagreed about the meanings in the story and there have been as many versions of it as there have been translators it still has remained a historic myth.
The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities to the Bible, especially in Genesis and it’s not just that the both begin with the letter “g”’! One major similarity being the flood story that is told in both works. The two stories are very similar but also very different. Another being the use of serpents in both works and how they represent the same thing. A third similarity being the power of God or gods and the influence they have on the people of the stories. Within these similarities there are also differences that need to be pointed out as well.
In both versions of the flood story something angers God (in Genesis) and the gods (in Gilgamesh). "The uproar of mankind is intolerable and sleep is no longer possible by reasons of the babel" (Gilgamesh 12). The Gilgamesh reason seems very illogical. The Gods decide to destroy mankind because they are making too much noise. It seems that the gods didn't think over their decision wisely. They are gods, wouldn't they have the power to block out the sound? One would think so, but obviously that was not the case. This is the first major difference between the two stories.
From the beginning of time, mythology has appeared to be one key method of understanding life’s confusions and battles. Within these myths lies a hero. From myth to myth and story to story, heroes experience what may be called a struggle or a journey, which lays down their plot line. Bearing tremendous strength, talent, and significant admiration, a hero holds what is precious to their audience, heroism. Over time however, no matter the hero, the hero’s role remains indistinguishable and identical to the position of every other hero.
So let's look at how these two selected passages allude to the nature of the works as they each give account of the great flood that kills all of mankind. The author of Gilgamesh portrays ...