Gilbert Sorrentino's Little Casino

1774 Words4 Pages

In Little Casino, through the experimentation of contemporary forms of narrative, Gilbert Sorrentino is able to capture a level of accuracy and honesty in representing a life as a collection of moments that is unachievable through conventional plot and characterization normally found in narrative. Sorrentino examines the feelings of love, lust, and death, with their relationship with objects rather than characters or context. Sorrentino captures each moment framing it like a photograph so that they transcend their context and convey a singular feeling independent of character, context, or location. In the chapter ‘Beauty Parade’ (63) Sorrentino captures adolescent lust and the nature of how objects have the ability to create unrealistic expectations …show more content…

From the chapter Imbecile and Slave (51), Sorrentino instead uses objects to associate meaning rather than characters or location, specifically using white revealing clothing or pale-blue dresses to capture lust, sex, or desire. In Imbecile and Slave an unnamed boy is infatuated and dumbfounded by a girl that ‘wore a white, one-piece strapless bathing suit’ which stays consistent with a motif of desire that surfaces continually throughout the book. The girls inhabiting these garments however, in both white underwear and pale blue dresses, are of shifting identity, proving that the object is more meaningful than the subject here. In the narrators commentary he states, “It doesn’t matter what lake in New Jersey this was. They were all alike. It doesn’t matter what the girl’s name was. They were all lovely. Hopatcong, Ellen, Budd, Natalie, Hiawatha, Carole. ‘I’ll close my eyes and she’ll just disappear, I know it, I know it,’ the idiot says. To himself at least.” The characters are unimportant; they become vehicles for the moments that Sorrentino is trying to capture, as well as the location. The ‘idiot’, here, underlines an important motive behind this book for Sorrentino, the characters are created and exist in the minds of the reader, and when the characters are placed behind the sensations that they …show more content…

Instead of the boy, the man Fat Harry ‘fell into the water one day at the Navy Yard, and was crushed to death between the hull of the Freighter John H. Derrenbacher, and the pier. A Norwegian scaler, half-drunk on his scaffold in the steam sun-light, heard his cries and looked down to see him, thrashing in the oily water, just as the ship was heaved up on a swell and rode into the pilings.’ Sorrentino recreates this scenario with a new subject but with much of the same effects, this allows the appreciation of meaning being derived from the sensations that this scene invokes, with the helplessness of the Norwegian scaler in such a brutal experience where he witness’ ‘[Fat Harry] more or less explode into a red surge of blood.’ These emotions thereby transcend their subjects and are captured into a moment to be experienced for the sensation rather than their context and subject. This is followed by the narrators commentary which notes that ‘the hull of ships of the considerable tonnage of the freighter, John H. Derrenbacher, are customarily repaired, scaled, and painted in dry dock; so that the death of Fat Harry, in the manner here described is highly improbable.’ Sorrentino uses the narrator to contradict the validity of this story to draw away from the taking meaning from the details, this is just as he did with the little boy, by abstracting the

Open Document