The final three chapters of George Bowering’s Shoot! Are perhaps the most powerful. After a novel-worth of fighting and being reckless, the law finally catches up to the Mclean boys and Hare. The characterization of the McLean boys and Alex Hare is opposed throughout their court scene. These boys, who have always been described as wild, now appear to be so small and frightened. Through these scenes, we watch the court proceedings of children who killed in cold blood, yet we see some form of innocence within them. Despite these circumstances, it is difficult to not see the children within these men, as some of them are, in modern times, children. A greater understanding into the characters of Archie McLean and Alex Hare shows that the horrors …show more content…
In a way, the novel accurately describes the court proceedings that would have happened to anyone at this time. Through these proceedings, we see the innocence in the young men, especially in Archie McLean and Alex Hare. These boys are the youngest and appear to be the most innocent men throughout the novel, which brings an insight into the reasoning behind their actions. Alex Hare, the man who, in court, defined his relationship with the McLean boys as “[picking his] friends poorly,” was in fact the man who delivered the fatal blow to Johnny Ussher (Bowering, 227). The McLean boys repeated through the court proceedings that they “did not kill Johnny Ussher… He killed [them],” (226). The McLeans and Hare almost contradict themselves within the court, claiming that they did not kill Ussher, as well as stating that they had something they needed to do and that Ussher was essentially a result of them doing what needed to be done. Charlie claims that the boys had something they needed to do that couldn’t be done from jail, and that is why there happened to be a fatality (227). Although the reader knows the extent of the boys’ characters and the reasoning behind the decision they made, the courts do not know such a thing. However, it is incredibly difficult to stand a fair trial when the defendant has been shot to death. With this knowledge, the courts produce the only …show more content…
Mara’s actions made him a despicable man, and because of their relationship to Mara - through him taking advantage of their sister, causing her, at fifteen, to become pregnant with an illegitimate child- the Mcleans and Alex Hare do not see their desires as anything more than looking out for their family. With this in mind, these boys could do no wrong, as they were only attempting to right the injustice that had happened towards their sister. Had they only been able to kill Mara for what he did to Annie McLean, perhaps they would have seen the outcome of their capture more justified. Once they were captured before they were able to finish their business, however, everything that occurred to them was injustice through their eyes. Alex Hare stated that, “Everybody’s been lying! [the Crown’s] goddamn witnesses sent their souls to hell! … Every word I’ve heard in this goddamn room has been a lie!” (227.) This shows that he truly believes that there is a great injustice being done to himself. As a man who had a proper upbringing of the time, it is strange to see Alex Hare as one of the MacLeans boys. His parents sent him to school, he was not an orphan, and there was almost no reason for him to follow men like the McLeans. He was, in essence, a spoiled young man with nothing better to do, and the hope that one day he could become famous. Alex Hare acted out throughout the court proceedings, and because of this it
Setting expatiates the theme of loss of innocence. For example, the four major characters in this story are sixteen and seventeen years old, which is the age when teenagers prepare to end their childhood and become adults. Also, the Devon school, where the story takes place, is a place where boys make the transition to full adulthood, and so this setting shows more clearly the boys' own growth. Finally, World War II, which in 1942 is raging in Europe, forces these teenage boys to grow up fast; during their seventeenth year they must evaluate everything that the war means to them and decide whether to take an active ...
Michael Patrick MacDonald lived a frightening life. To turn the book over and read the back cover, one might picture a decidedly idyllic existence. At times frightening, at times splendid, but always full of love. But to open this book is to open the door to Southie's ugly truth, to MacDonald's ugly truth, to take it in for all it's worth, to draw our own conclusions. One boy's hell is another boy's playground. Ma MacDonald is a palm tree in a hurricane, bending and swaying in the violent winds of Southie's interior, even as things are flying at her head, she crouches down to protect her children, to keep them out of harms way. We grew up watching Sesame Street, Reading Rainbow and Peanuts. Michael Patrick MacDonald grew up watching violence, sadness and death.
Killing Mr. Griffin is a story, which captures the reader’s attention by developing themes. It’s suspenseful; it includes topics from love and friendship to guilt and murder. Susan McConnell had a slow life, but at a sudden moment, she gets hit by a social wave and is caught in a wave of peer pressure, manipulation, psychopaths and a battle of her conscience. The moral lesson that has been shown inside the book is being careful for what you wish for. The grass might seem greener on the other side but is it actually? People don’t always seem how they appear to be either good or bad (Mr. Griffin, Mark Kinney.)
Murder on a Sunday morning is a documentary of an unfortunate mishap with the legal justice system that happens one of many times. In Jacksonville, Florida the year of 2001, May 8th there was a horrific scenery at Ramada hotel. A women named Mary Ann Stevens and her husband were tourists, while leaving their room early Sunday morning around 9AM a gunshot fatally killed Mary Ann and ended the couple’s vacation. When cops arrived at the scene and investigated they took notes on what the suspect looked like from the husband, “ The suspect is skinny black male dark shorts unknown shirt on foot running south bound…. Fishlike hat on.”- cop at the scene. When the cops were driving around they’ve spotted an African American
As the sweltering, hot sun signified the start of a scorching afternoon, a young boy lay in the fields harvesting vegetables for another family. He had been enslaved to perform chores around the house for the family, and was only given very few privileges. While his stomach throbbed with pangs of hunger, he continued cooking meals for them. After the family indulged in the cozy heat from the fireplace, he was the one to clean the ashes. Despite his whole body feeling sore from all the rigorous work he completed, the young boy had been left alone to suffer. As months passed by, he desired independence. He wanted to cook his own food, make his own fire, harvest his own plants and earn money. The lad soon discovered that he needed faith and courage to break away from his restricted environment. When put in a suppressive situation, every person has the aspiration to escape the injustice. This is what Harrison Bergeron and Sanger Rainsford do to liberate themselves from the external forces that govern their lives. Harrison, the main character of “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut, is a strong, fourteen year old boy whose talents have been concealed by the government. Growing up in an environment where equality has restricted people’s thinking, Harrison endeavors to change society’s views. Rainsford, the main character of “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, is a skilled hunter who believes that animals were made to be hunted; he has no sympathy for them. Stranded on island with a killer chasing him, he learns to make rational choices. While both Harrison and Ranisford are courageous characters, Rainsford’s prudence enables him to overpower his enemy, whereas Harrison’s impulsive nature results in him being ...
Accordingly, this visit to McMurphy’s childhood home offers a glimpse into what a true man ought to be. McMurphy’s young age at the time of the incident—a time before society’s rules could change what is naturally in the child—particularly shows what a boy or man ought to be. McMurphy the child exemplifies all of McMurphy the adult’s best qualities, and yet is freer: the child is active, virile, and sexually mature, without fear of retribution from the
July 15, 1999, was an ordinary night for Kristopher Lohrmeyer as he left work at the Colorado City Creamer, a popular ice cream parlor. Kristopher had no idea that his life was about to end. When Michael Brown, 17, Derrick Miller and Andrew (Andy) Medina, 15, approached Kristopher and demanded his money and his car keys. Before the boys knew it shots had been fired and Kristopher was dead. About an hour after the fatal shooting of Kristopher Lohrmeyer, all three men were in custody and telling their version of the night’s events. Michael and Derrick who had run away after the shooting confessed to police and named Andy as the shooter. According to the three boy’s testimony, they had only recently met and needed away to get some quick cash, so they developed a carjacking scheme and headed to Andy’s house to pick up 2 stolen handguns. The three boys were uneducated and had spent most of their time on the streets in search of drugs. The judge ruled that they would be held without bail and there was probable cause to charge them all with first-degree murder (Thrown Away, 2005).
Dubus, Andre. "Killings." Meyer, Michael. In The Bedford Introduction to Literature. Ed. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2008. 107 - 120.
The sensational novel is usually a tale of our own times. Proximity is indeed one great element of sensation. A tale which aims to electrify the nerves of the reader is never thoroughly effective unless the scene be laid out in our own days and among the people we are in the habit of meeting. In keeping with mid-Victorian themes, Lady Audley’s Secret is closely connected to the street literature and newspaper accounts of real crimes. The crimes in Braddon’s novel are concealed and secret. Like the crimes committed by respected doctors and trusted ladies, the crimes in Lady Audley’s Secret shock because of their unexpectedness. Crime in the melodrama of the fifties and sixties is chilling, because of the implication that dishonesty and violence surround innocent people. A veneer of virtue coats ambitious conniving at respectability. Lady Audley’s Secret concludes with a triumph of good over evil, but at the same time suggests unsettlingly that this victory occurs so satisfyingly only in melodramas (Kalikoff, 9...
Guilty or not guilty? This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a person feels inside is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.
Both of the boys accusations were very severe. Steve Harmon was being tried for bring an accomplice in a murder/robbery in a convenience store. Even though there's not much information on the arrest itself it was hinted that he was found around the neighborhood and was trying to film for his class when he was arrested .Whereas, Brenton Butler was tried as the killer of an older tourist that was white. Butler was outside by his house when police spotted him, they took him in for questioning just because the description of the murderer was that he was African American. Once arrested they were both introduced to the people who could change their fate in the courtroom.
Keeping readers on the edges of their seats with intriguing characters and enjoyable story lines makes the readers want to read more. The three authors O’Flaherty, Connel, and Alverz distributed many different literary elements. Each of them enhanced conflict, gave understandable characters, and a relatable setting. “Liberty”, “The Dangerous Game”, and “The Sniper” had many similarities and differences throughout each story.
As juror number one, I had to research why Johnny should, or should not be tried for the murder of Bob Sheldon, the Soc. I also had to research murder among teens and what happened during the killing of Bob Sheldon. During my research, I found that murder was considered a premeditated killing, and I also found that Johnny can only be tried for murder in Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina because of his age. Johnny was planning on saving, Ponyboy Curtis, who at the time was being drowned by David, the Soc Bob had told him to “give Ponyboy a bath.” In trying to save Ponyboy he pulled out his pocket knife and stabbed Bob Sheldon in the back therefore causing David to release Ponyboy and flee the scene. After finding that information I also found that Bob Sheldon and his group of friends had stopped their car on The Greasers side of town and got out to show them a lesson for taking out their girls. ...
Young boys normally have huge imaginations and are willing to break the rules to have fun. In “An Encounter” by James Joyce, the boys “disrupt their identity as a subject of school by desiring adventure and escape from another layer of civil society which is instrumental in colonizing desire and limiting freedom” (Murphy 15). The three boys enjoy letting their imagination run wild as they play cowboys and Indians in the evenings after school. “The adventures related in the literature of the Wild West were so remote from the narrator’s nature he explains that it still open doors of escape” (Murphy 12). Even though some did not enjoy playing such game, their sense of adventure never faded. There were times when their sense of adventure found its way into the classroom. Father Butle...
Royko, Mike. “Death to the Killers.” Patterns Plus: A Short Prose Reader with Argumentation, Fifth Edition. Ed. Mary Lou Conlin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1995. 353-356. Print.