Gandhi Nonviolence Analysis

1061 Words3 Pages

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi made many successful changes in India by 1939 through the practice of Satyagraha, which is a form of non-violence. Gandhi used Satyagraha in many forms such as marches, boycotts and hunger strikes, but they all followed the same rules and procedures with complete honesty and without using violence. His firm belief in non-violence helped India become independent on August 15 1947 from the British Empire. According to Gandhi, Non-violence is the greatest force that is available to humankind, and it is stronger than any known weapon of mass destruction. Gandhi describes non-violence as a living force of power that is above brute force. He asserts that its limits are immeasurable and that it is the search for truth. Gandhi further says that nonviolence is not a weapon of the weak but rather one, which can be tried by everyone, and it works the same for all individuals. Nonviolence must begin with the mind and should dissociate from fear for it to be reliable and efficient. According to Gandhi, “ my creed of non-violence is an …show more content…

The world today is full of war, conflicts and lack of peace.many nations are into wars for various reasons. If Gandhi 's principles could be upheld, the world could be a better place to live in. Gandhi firmly believed in the possibility of a predominantly peaceful society; he however asserts that a government cannot be entirely non-violent. The science of nonviolence can be a stepping-stone towards a pure democracy. For communities to uphold real democracy, they must be courageously non-violent on a national scale to realize a democratic government. Gandhi propagates that non-violence should be the law of life for an individual, a society, a government, and even on an international scale. When one takes care of the means in any situation, then the end takes care of itself. As for the case of non-violence and democracy, non-violence is the means and real democracy as a

Open Document