Frances Burney's Evelina

1022 Words3 Pages

Frances Burney’s Evelina suggests that the innocence of a young girl is often her most prized possession, but in this text, innocence does not have a single definition. The two definitions of innocence presented in the text, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) are, “freedom from sin, guilt, or moral wrong in general; the state of being untainted with, or unacquainted with, evil; moral purity” and “freedom from specific guilt; the fact of not being guilty of that with which one is charged; guiltlessness” (“Innocence”). Evelina’s progression throughout the text challenges and explores the boundaries of her innocence. Furthermore, the boundaries of her innocence are defined by the line of Eve, which is a phrase that describes her …show more content…

Villars continues in his letter to Lady Howard about Caroline Evelyn, “I need not speak to your Ladyship of the virtues of that excellent young creature” (Burney 16). Mr. Villars clearly held Caroline in high esteem, thus his reliability regarding the story of her fall from innocence comes into question. He states that he regretted not accompanying her to Madam Duval for if he had, “the misery and disgrace which awaited her, might, perhaps, have been avoided” (Burney 16). It is this lingering regret that suggests his role as a moral guardian to Evelina is, in part, a kind of compensation for his previous failures. Furthermore, his failure is explicitly related to Caroline’s specific type of innocence. Because “every body believed her innocent from the guiltless tenor of her unspotted youth,” we immediately understand that the OED’s secondary definition of innocence describes her (Burney 17). Caroline Evelyn dies in childbirth without any proof of her marriage to Sir John Belmont, essentially bastardizing her child, Evelina. Her innocence falls under the umbrella of the latter definition given by the OED because she is guiltless in the sense that she was a victim of her circumstances. Although she did not have a child out of wedlock, the actions of Belmont transformed her innocence, thus Caroline Evelyn contrasts the innocence of Evelina who is “as innocent as an angel” and solidifies the line of Eve’s deviation from the OED’s first definition of innocence as a signal of failure for Mr. Villars (Burney

Open Document