Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of aid in development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I. Aid has no Effect on Growth
One of the earliest papers that examined the impact of foreign aid on economic growth was Boone (1995). Boon used a neoclassical model, and his time frame was 4 samples of 5-year average from 1971-1990. He focused on the effect of policy on the effectiveness of aid by comparing three political regime scenarios in developing countries. The first scenario, was egalitarian regime where the government maximize welfare of a fixed group of citizens utility; the second, was elitist regime where the government maximize welfare to their fellow tribe members utility; and last, laissez-faire regime where the government maximize welfare of a small fraction of its citizens. He found that the model that best capture the effectiveness of foreign aid is the elitist regime. He found no impact of aid on growth in all different regimes. Concluded that this is because aid effects government consumption not investment, which will not result in elevating poverty in receiving countries. However, he found that a laissez-faire government has the lowest infant death rate. So that aid targeting laissez-faire government might be more efficient. More over, the study found that failure of aid to alleviate poverty is that poverty is not caused by a shortage of capital which aid provides.
In her controversial book ”Dead Aid”, Dambisa Moyo argues that aid is not only ineffective but also have disastrous outcome. Billions of dollars of development assistance to African countries over the past years have not succeeded to alleviate poverty and reach sustained growth levels. In fact these countries witnessed a rise in poverty and a slow growth. Comparing between African countries that rejected aid and grown such as Rwanda, South Af...
... middle of paper ...
...project.org/who/index.htm
Moyo, Dambisa. Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Macmillan, 2009.
Rajan, R. G., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show?. The Review of economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643-665.
Rethinking poverty report on the world social situation 2010 United nations, new york
2009 Department of Economic and social affairs.
Sachs, Jeffrey, et al. "Ending Africa's poverty trap." Brookings papers on economic activity 2004.1 (2004): 117-240.
Sachs, J. (2006). The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.
Sachs, J.D., Warner, A.M., (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1-118.
World Bank Data. (2013). Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DC.DAC.NLDL.CD
Before extending aid to other countries, we should focus on our more prevalent domestic problems. Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous. Almost every American knows it, feels it, believes it." The topic of United States foreign policy is greatly debated, and a decision on how to handle is very hard to come by. It seems as if we are finally leaning towards less aid to foreign countries, as we try to cut wasteful spending. The American government is finally opening its eyes to the realization that all of the aid we are giving out may not be worth it. Our priority should be to help our homeless, instead of other countries' poor.
Shah Anup, (2013) Structural Adjustment: A major cause of poverty. Philosophy and Theory, Vol.43, No.S1, 2011, USA. http://www.globalissues.org/article/3/structural-adjustment-a-major-cause-of-poverty
Dennis Pirages and Christine Sylvester (eds.), Transformations in the Global Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1989).
“Africa is failing to keep up with population growth not because it has exhausted its potential, but instead because too little has been invested in reaching that potential.” Paarlberg backs this claim with evidence that India’s food issue was solved with foreign assistance in development and offers that the solution to Africa’s food shortage is also development and farm modernization endorsed by foreign aid.
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Shah, Anup. “Poverty Facts and Stats.” Global Issues, Updated: 28 Mar. 2010. Accessed: 05 Apr. 2010.
Sachs, J. D. (2010/2011). Can Extreme Poverty Be Eliminated? Annual Editions: Social Problems 10/11 , pp. 71-75.
Strange, S. (1994), ‘Wake up Krasner! The world has changed’, Review of International Political Economy, Summer 1994, 1 (2), pp. 209-20, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Haddad, M., Shepherd, B., & World Bank. (2011). Managing openness: Trade and outward-oriented growth after the crisis. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
“…increasing international trade and financial flows since the Second World War have fostered sustained economic growth over the long term in the world’s high-income states. Some with idle incomes have prospered as well, but low-income economies generally have not made significant gains. The growing world economy has not produced balanced, healthy economic growth in the poorer states. Instead, the cycle of underdevelopment more aptly describes their plight. In the context of weak economies, the negative effects of international trade and foreign investments have been devastating. Issues of trade and currency values preoccupy the economic policies of states with low-income economies even more than those with high incomes because the downturns are far more debilitating.1”
Frank, Barney (1999), “The Correct Approach to Globalization,” Congressional Record, [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 17 May 2012.
Bangladesh has been working to improve its country because it is one of the poorest ones in the world (Islam, 1992). It is one the world’s most densely populated countries with 161 million people. Forty-three percent of the people there still live there and it till has one of the highest prevalence of child malnutrition in the world at 41% (Bangladesh, n.d.)). Foreign aid has been given to the country to try and help get them out of poverty. From the period of 1971 to 2012, Bangladesh received about $56.5 billion in foreign aid (Hossain, 2014). The annual flow ranges from $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion (Quibria, 2010). The United States contributes about 6.29% of the foreign assistance to Bangladesh as bilateral donors (Hossain, 2014).
The Globalization of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms, Michel Chossudovsky, (Penang: Third World Network, 1997). https://globalsociology.pbworks.com/w/page/14711303/What%20is%20Globalization http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/09/economic-history-1
...m having an authoritarian leader even if he is trying to help the country grow. Also, the authors don’t believe in foreign aid and they explain that usually only 10% actually reaches the helpless. However, even if only 1% of the intended aid was going to the actual recipients, than that would still be an accomplishment over nothing.