Food Safety Regulatory System

1293 Words3 Pages

Food safety has been a controversial topic for many years now. The US realized the flaws in the food industry at an early time and did the best in their power to fix it, but as time went on it seems we've become more corrupt rather than more safe. The US government should spend more time making sure the places our foods are coming from are safe in order to resolve all of the health issues people are faced with due to the foods we consume.
For many years, there have been concerns on the foods that are being put into our bodies. Although we are more aware of the foods we have now, they didn’t just brush these problems off in the 1800s. “Wiley devoted his career to raising public awareness of problems with adulterated food; developing standards …show more content…

“The United States' food safety regulatory system is in urgent need of reform ... Congress needs to act now to modernize the FDA and fund it sufficiently. The cost of inaction is high, both financially and in terms of illnesses and deaths Americans have endured during the numerous contaminated food outbreaks that have recently occurred.” (DeWaal 1) Flaws in the food system are causing an incredible amount of illness within the US. The US people cannot wait any longer for the solutions to our broken food system. (DeWaal 1) “Reform of the food safety system is overdue. CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] estimates that foodborne diseases cause 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths annually. Economists believe that these illnesses pose a huge burden to society, with estimates for emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and lost work ranging from 40 billion to well over 100 billion dollars annually. Even if these numbers were cut in half, they are still too high. These are illnesses and deaths that are largely preventable.” (DeWaal 1) All we need to do is make a change so our food system does not remain corrupt and we would automatically fix so many current issues. Millions of lives could easily be saved, as well as money due to the decrease of hospital visits caused by contaminated and …show more content…

“The agency has billed the proposed regulations as key tools for implementing the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), the biggest FDA food-safety update in more than seven decades, which President Obama signed into law in January 2011. The new rules would cost about half a billion dollars per year. The cost of FSMA will be borne by farmers and food producers of all sizes. The FDA estimates the FSMA will cost America’s small farms about $13,000 each per year. Larger farms — much more capable of bearing the costs — will be out about $30,000 per year. Other food producers are likely to face varying fees. But will the proposed rules make America’s food supply — already quite safe and getting safer thanks to conscientious farmers, producers, and sellers of all sizes, vigilant watchdog groups, and eagle-eyed food-safety lawyers — any safer?” (Food Safety News 1) These people believe the food reform is costing the US too much money and that it’s not necessary. They think our food system is safe enough. Many others disagree with this statement. They believe more should be done in order to improve the system. “A central contention is the degree to which either side trusts, or doesn’t trust, pronouncements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies that food resulting from genetic engineering is safe and no different

More about Food Safety Regulatory System

Open Document