Fire Attack Case Study

385 Words1 Page

As the president it would be a difficult decision to make, on resolving such an out of control issue. As time is squandered with the agents outside, many children are continuing to be abused by the organization. If a frontal assault was made using tear gas the organization might harm the children more, as a way of defense. The best way to resolve the issue would be to intimidate the enemy. The compound might be fortified with guns and ammunition, but it would run out if a fire fight took place with the government’s supply. The first move would be to not only surround the compound with agents, but also heavy artillery weapons. Weapons such as helicopters, tanks and many trained armed forces. If intimidation does not work, an undercover operation might need to take place. For example the agents can leave the …show more content…

This mission would most likely take place during the night, where visibility is very low. When least expected smoke screens and tear gas may be used to surprise the enemy and catch them off guard. This operation may seem a little to straight forward, but it proved to be effective in the murder of infamous terrorist Osama Bin Laden. This operation was held during the night and proved to be a success with no casualties on the friendly side. Personally, I would not choose this kind of action. For this action to be chosen this means there was no other way of handling the problem. Now, during the confusion of smokes and tear gas going off, the agents would first secure the safety of the children. Second, if a fire fight does happen officials would have a quicker reaction time to wear off danger. In addition to this no children would be injured in the middle of this brawl. Although this approach might seem dangerous, there is very little possibility the enemy would consider collaborating on a resolution. When hostages are being used as a way of defense most of the time they do not end

More about Fire Attack Case Study

Open Document