Explain the way in which Duffy presents the strengths and limitations

1195 Words3 Pages

Explain the way in which Duffy presents the strengths and limitations

of language in two poems.

When drawing from both 'Warming Her Pearls' and 'Selling Manhattan' ,

it is evident that Carol Anne Duffy maintains a certain avant-garde

approach to the vast array of possibilities that language presents.

She acutely exposes the ambiguity that language holds in its meanings,

presenting the reader with endless connotations to consider. Duffy

also draws attention to its inability to fully express the extent of

human emotions.

Both of the above stated poems focus on societal and cultural

stratification, with Duffy's use of language carefully designed to

emphasise the distance between different social groups. 'Selling

Manhattan' being a dramatic monologue, articulates the thoughts of the

Dutch settler, Peter Minuit, who is reputed to have bought Manhattan

from the North American Indians, for twenty-four dollars worth of

glass beads, in 1626. A strong division and contrast exists when this

is compared to the feelings of an indigenous North American Indian.

Duffy uses language to demonstrate this contrast. In Minuit's glee, he

states 'I got myself a bargain'. This heavily exhibits his rapacious

attitude and his inability to consider the cost to others that his

actions create. The value that he places on money is also shown. This

is a key theme to the entire section, also entitled 'Selling

Manhattan', with Duffy fiercely criticising the capitalist attitude to

economics. Duffy's use of language with the words 'I ' and 'myself' in

Minuit's stanza draws attention to just how self absorbed the Dutchman

really is.

When the reader is first introduced to the Indian a comparison is

automatically made. The first line i...

... middle of paper ...

...uses on intimate detail. It could also however

be interpreted as being the result of an obscene and abnormal

obsession. When considering that this poem is not based upon a modern

society, holding modern values that are now far more accepting towards

homosexuality, the ambiguity in the depth of this line creates a

hindrance to any sympathy that a reader may feel. A reader may take on

a similar attitude to that which is evident in the society that

'Warming Her Pearls' describes, perceiving an iniquitous abnormality.

Additionally, as this possibility exists that her seeming love is in

fact an obsession, the reader has no choice but to question their

belief in her affections. The influence and energy of this poem is

therefore abridged by this ambiguity, due to the lack of absolute

meaning in language, as illustrated by the French philosopher, Jacques

Derrida.

Open Document