Essay On Critical Regionalism

2204 Words5 Pages

The following essay will investigate four out of the six characteristics of Critical Regionalism and its reflections on place, identity and the problems caused by universalization. Mapungubwe will be used as a case study to exemplify and illustrate Critical Regional ism while assessing whether or not it is successful with regards to these four principles.
What is Critical Regionalism? The concept for Critical Regionalism came into existence in the 1980s as an approach towards architecture that retaliates against “placelessness” (Frampton 1983:16) while it aspires to eliminate the lack of meaning in modern architecture by using contextual forces to give a sense of place and depth to buildings. (Eggner 1984:229) The main aim of this well-grounded concept is, as said by Paul Ricour: "How to be modern and to continue the tradition, how to revive an old dormant civilization as part of universal civilization’. According to Frampton, Critical Regionalism should embrace modern architecture for its universal, progressive qualities while simultaneously valuing the responses which are particular to the context (Frampton 1952:148). Emphasis should be placed upon topography, climate, light and tectonic form as an alternative for the visual (Frampton 1952:148). As put forth by Tzonis and Lefaivre, Critical Regionalism is not obligated to extract from the context, instead elements can be removed of their context and can be used in unfamiliar ways.
The non-exhaustive list of Critical Regionalism that will be mentioned include, Culture and Civilization, The Resistance of the Place-Form, Culture vs. Nature and Visual vs. Tactile. To illustrate the above, evidence must be drawn from the conclusion of the analysis made of the 4 principles. Mapungubwe...

... middle of paper ...

...of Mapunqubwe, and as a final point the historical landscape (Figure 1) (Design and Construction... 2010:17). All of the above principles interrelate with one another to create a complex unity.
Therefore, by assessing the source through an intense critical analysis of each of the four principles along with their relative images, according to Frampton’s 6 principles, it is undoubtedly evident that the Mapungubwe Interpretation Center has considered that which is mandatory in order to be a successful edifice and has excelled at the implementation of Frampton’s principles while simultaneously resisting the architecture of universalization. Consequently this center has become a creation which is both equally as well as successfully modern while simultaneously being a historical site by discovering the perfect balance and becoming a unique and truly South African site.

Open Document