Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Suicide motives in the middle ages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Suicide motives in the middle ages
In today’s society we look upon the victims of suicide with feelings of compassion for the desperation that had preceded their demise. Elizabethans, however, viewed those who committed suicide not as victims but perpetrators guilty of a criminal offense. By closely examining Elizabethan’s laws against perpetrators of suicide alongside the funeral precession of Ophelia in Hamlet, we can better understand why Ophelia received a Christian burial regardless from the fact that she committed suicide and how this would make sense to Shakespeare’s audience. By doing some close readings of the text we can see the power struggle between Church and King, a reflection of Elizabethan England through the procession. Through close examination we can see how much like in our own time those with power and authority tend to have leniency when judgment is brought on them.
Suicide was considered a heinous crime and a sin against God in early 17th century England, so much so that the laws against it was rigorously enforced. When a death was under suspicion of suicide, a coroner’s jury was summoned from a district to assist a coroner in determining the cause of a person’s death . Resembling a grand jury, the coroner’s jury reviewed evidence and stated how, when and where that person had died. “The legal choice faced by coroner’s juries deliberating on the bodies of suicides was ostensibly simple: they could find that the deceased killed himself while sane, and thus was a felon on himself (felo de se), or they could decide that he was insane and thus innocent of any crime (non compos mentis) (Michael MacDonald). If a verdict of felo de se was returned, the suicide was denied the rights to a Christian burial; the corpse would be left naked in a ditch...
... middle of paper ...
...raged at the scene; Elizabethans are all too familiar of the power-struggle between the English monarchies and the church.
Works Cited
Beauregard, David. “Great Command O’ersways The Order”: Purgatory, Revenge, And Maimed Rites In Hamlet.” Relgion & The Arts 11.1 (2007): 45-73.
Guernsey, R. S.. Ecclesiastical Law in Hamlet: The Burial of Ophelia. New York: AMS Press, 1971. Print.
MacDonald, Michael. "Shakespeare Quarterly." Ophelia's Maimèd Rites 37: 309-317. Print.
Shakespeare, William, and Robert S. Miola. Hamlet: text of the play, the actors' gallery, contexts, criticism, afterlives, resources. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2011. Print.
The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "coroner's jury (law)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 5 May 2014. .
Watson, Robert N. 1990. 'Giving up the Ghost in a World of Decay: Hamlet, Revenge and Denial.' Renaissance Drama 21:199-223.
While Hamlet may still be feeling depressed Hamlet moves into the stage of denial and isolation. Hamlet feels the effects of denial and isolation mostly due to his love, Ophelia. Both Hamlet’s grief and his task constrain him from realizing this love, but Ophelia’s own behavior clearly intensifies his frustration and anguish. By keeping the worldly and disbelieving advice of her brother and father as “watchmen” to her “heart” (I.iii.46), she denies the heart’s affection not only in Hamlet, but in herself; and both denials add immeasurably to Hamlet’s sense of loneliness and loss—and anger. Her rejection of him echoes his mother’s inconstancy and denies him the possibility even of imagining the experience of loving an...
Findlay, Alison. "Hamlet: A Document in Madness." New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thornton Burnett and John Manning. New York: AMS Press, 1994. 189-205.
Watson, Robert N. 1990. 'Giving up the Ghost in a World of Decay: Hamlet, Revenge and Denial.' Renaissance Drama 21:199-223.
Mack, Maynard. “The World of Hamlet.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of Hamlet. Ed. David Bevington. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1968.
Green, T. A. "The jury and the English law of homicide, 1200-1600.". Ann Arbor, MI: Mich. L. Rev. 74 (1976): 413-499.
Crawford, Alexander W. Hamlet, an ideal prince, and other essays in Shakesperean interpretation: Hamlet; Merchant of Venice; Othello; King Lear. Boston R.G. Badger, 1916. Shakespeare Online. 20 Aug. 2009. < http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/hamlet/hamletmelancholy.html >.
Manning, John. "Symbola and Emblemata in Hamlet." New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thornton Burnett and John Manning. New York: AMS Press, 1994. 11-18.
Vest, Rob. “Country Matters and Sins Remembered: Ophelia in Hamlet, Prince of Denmark”. Indiana University Southeast. n.p. 22 July 2002. Web. 28 May 2014.
It is widely believed that “Living life without honor is a tragedy bigger than death itself” and this holds true for Hamlet’s Ophelia. Ophelia’s death symbolizes a life spent passively tolerating Hamlet’s manipulations and the restrictions imposed by those around her, while struggling to maintain the last shred of her dignity. Ophelia’s apathetic reaction to her drowning suggests that she never had control of her own life, as she was expected to comply with the expectations of others. Allowing the water to consume her without a fight alludes to Hamlet’s treatment of Ophelia as merely a device in his personal agenda. Her apparent suicide denotes a desire to take control of her life for once. Ophelia’s death is, arguably, an honorable one, characterized by her willingness to let go of her submissive, earth-bound self and leave the world no longer a victim.
Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Kelly J. Mays. 11th ed. New York: Norton, 2013.1709-1804. Print.
Beginning with the Greeks, tragedy has been an essential form of entertainment. Although it has changed slightly over time due to different religious and social values, it is still written and performed to this day. Perhaps the most well known tragedy of all time is Shakespeare's Hamlet. Hamlet is perhaps the epitome of all tragedy. Not only does the tragic hero Hamlet meet his demise, but all the main characters in the play at some point due to some flaw in their character, or some fatal decision, also meet the same fate. It is because of their character flaw and/or their fatal decision at some time during the play that their death can be justified.
Mack, Maynard. "The World of Hamlet." Yale Review. vol. 41 (1952) p. 502-23. Rpt. in Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1996.
Watson, Robert N. 1990. 'Giving up the Ghost in a World of Decay: Hamlet, Revenge and Denial.' Renaissance Drama 21:199-223.
The puzzling tragedy that is Hamlet will forever be speculated, which is why it has attracted such attention and praise. The madness in which Hamlet lives draws decisions of polarizing weight. Stay righteous and live out your life with your father’s killer? Or do you slay him and suffer before god and the law? It bears moments of wisdom, followed by inexplicable actions and Vis versa. One moment you find the protagonist staring at his girlfriend with his pants at his ankles, the next you find him contemplating the value of life. It’s hard to determine what the message behind the wildcard character that Hamlet is. William Shakespeare’s tragedy “Hamlet” unravels opposing subjects, superstition instead of righteousness, private revenge or public revenge; it portrays the contradictions emerging in the religious revival of the Renaissance as “Christian humanism” was taking form in Western Europe. An aspect of the play reveals and mocks the hypocrisy of the kingdoms as they exert authority and pose as the ideal of religion. The king is a murderer who prays to god without belief. The one who attempts to remain righteous is an outcast amongst his kingdom. The biggest speculation is drawn on the rectitude of revenge. Does Hamlet have the right to kill his uncle? If so, does Laertes then have the right to kill Hamlet? Is Fortinbras the only exception of just revenge when he is motivated by honor, while the others rage over personal revenge? In the wake of these quarrels, the most evident and obvious Christian Humanist belief is held true...evil never wins. The punishment of those who died in Hamlet is virtuous and deserving. Those who stooped to treachery suffered the consequence.