Dunlap Scandal Summary

1088 Words3 Pages

The Sunbeam Corporation’s former CEO, Al “Chainsaw” Dunlap was a turnaround specialist and professional downsizer. Dunlap did not believe that corporations owed loyalty to their community or to their employees. His prospective was that the appropriate corporate concern was for their stockholders and that the primary goal of any business should be to make money for its shareholders. (Byme, 1998), Before his employment as CEO of Sunbeam, he had achieved notable success with Scott Paper and Crown Zellerbach. His methods were ruthless even by American Corporate standards. Dunlap’s goal was to show the maximum possible profits. In order to achieve his goals he made widespread cuts, laid off thousands of employees, and closed plants and factories. …show more content…

The basic allegations in this class action suit was that the shareholders were misled as to the value of Sunbeam’s stock in violation of the Securities and Exchange act of 1934. Because the financial statements misrepresented and omitted information regarding he business operations, sales, and sales trends the shareholders ultimately suffered financial loss as a result. As CEO of Sunbeam, Dunlap was charged with utilizing earnings manipulation to achieve fraudulent financial goals. Legal actions against Dunlap did not stop at the shareholders action in the civil courts, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought charges against Dunlap, Russell Kersh, Robert Gluck, Donald R. Uzzi and Lee B. Griffith, all former officers of Sunbeam Corporation in May 2001. (CNN Money Staff, 2001). The SEC allegations included that Dunlap had engineered a massive accounting fraud with the cooperation and in collaboration with the four other former Sunbeam executives and the Sunbeam’s lead partner with Arthur Andersen …show more content…

The SEC determined that Sunbeam filed quarterly and annual reports that had false financial statements and failed to make required disclosure. Subsequently the SEC findings went on to state “Sunbeam's books and records were manifestly inaccurate on so many items and over such an extended period of time as to indicate complete failure of internal controls in violation of Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B).” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,

More about Dunlap Scandal Summary

Open Document