Duncan Betrayal In Macbeth

905 Words2 Pages

Children are consequently taught from generation to generation that when people decide to cause evil or harm to others, it will often end up coming back towards the inflictor to their self-harm. In “Macbeth” By William Shakespeare, karma is a major thematic message in the form of Macbeth killing his own king Duncan to claim the throne. However, this first betrayal leads to many others as Macbeth becomes more concerned about keeping this power. As a result, Macbeth’s betrayal of others through acts of murder leads conclusively to his downfall by depriving himself of his humanity-his emotions/relationships. Accordingly, this can be shown throughout the play via his loss of morality for his actions, development of paranoia, and isolation from …show more content…

At the start of the play, Macbeth is known to be a fearless and known to value the trust of others. To demonstrate, during the battle between Norway and Scotland, a wounded soldier described Macbeth as “sparrows, eagles, or the hare, the lion.” (1.2.39). Namely, Macbeth before choosing to murder Duncan also first reminds himself that he is a loyal kinsman to his king and should not commit the murder. “First, I am his kinsman and his subject, / Strong both against…Not bear the knife myself” (1.7.13-16). Nevertheless, Macbeth becomes much more fearful and suspicious of others in fear of losing power. For instance, Macbeth schemes to murder Banquo and Fleance out of the fear that Banquo’s sons could possibly become King. “To be thus is nothing, But to be safely thus: Our fears in Banquo stick deep;” (3.1.52-54). Through the act of hiring murderers to commit this deed also shows cowardice and fear over guilt itself. Moreover, the extent of his paranoia can also be seen when he tells Lady Macbeth: “There’s not a one of them but in his house/ I keep a servant fee’d” (3.4.132-133). It shows that Macbeth has developed fear in lords not involved in the conflict as well. In short, Macbeth’s development of paranoia has also led to his downfall by paranoia as it results in him depriving his inner …show more content…

Furthermore, this is by losing his allies while developing enemies as a result. Specifically, this is seen when his tyranny becomes revealed to others through the state of Scotland, which have led most of the people to abandon him during the final battle between him and Malcolm. “Bring me no reports; let them fly all;” (5.3.1). This is a deep contrast to when soldiers were honoured to fight for Macbeth, such as when during the war between Scotland and Norway, a wounded soldier tells King Duncan, and the other soldiers: “For brave Macbeth-well he deserves that name- / Disdaining fortune…Till he faced the slave;” (1.2.18-22). In essence, the isolation from his betrayal of Duncan has led him to lose a king who tried at his utmost power to reward Macbeth for his loyalty. “Would thou hadst less deserved;/ That the portion…More is thy due than more than all can pay.” (1.4.21-24). Macbeth also considers this when he tries to decide whether he should kill Duncan or not: “Besides this Duncan//Hath borne his facilities so meek, hath been / So clear in his great office,” (1.7.16-18). Hence, Macbeth becoming isolated from people who once cared for him has also cause his downfall by having left no one to fight for

Open Document