Duality In Lord Of The Flies Essay

1128 Words3 Pages

Lord of the Flies: Final Essay William Golding’s Lord of the Flies explores the distinct boundaries and relationship of civilization and the nature of evil. In the novel, a group of English schoolboys crash into an island and begin to divide, in war within themselves and the boys around them. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies offers insight on the duality of the human condition through characterization, setting and symbolism. Throughout the novel, Golding explores the relationship between the conceptual ideas, focusing on the internal conflict between the conditioning of civility and the innate will to act on ‘evil’ desires. The characterization of the boys emphasizes the inner conflict between the civility and nature of evil within themselves, …show more content…

The masks and body paint, that Jack’s tribe paints themselves with, hold symbolic value in the internal conflict: “Demoniac figures with faces of red and white and green rushed out howling … Jack was safe from shame or self-consciousness behind the mask of his paint and could look each of them in turn.” (154). “‘But they’ll be painted! You know how it is--’ The others nodded. They understood only too well the liberation into savagery the concealing paint brought.” (191). The paint allows the boys to distance themselves from the evil actions by treating the masks as alter egos in which they satisfy evil desires. Golding describes the duality in Jack’s tribe and their need to please the domesticated self by distancing itself from the animalistic alter ego, which now overpowers the civil self. Another symbol Golding utilizes is the Lord of the Flies. The rotting pig head represents the same alter ego—the nature of the evil manifesting itself through the antagonistic Beastie which taunts Simon: “‘I’m the Beast … For a moment or two the forest and all other dimply appreciated places with the parody of laughter. ‘You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?’” (158). The projection of the evil within the boys shows antagonism towards the boys’ attempt at civilization, furthering the distinct opposing forces in and around the boys. The nature of evil is treated as an enemy that speaks to them, rather than speaks within them. The use of the boys’ differentiation of the two alter egos adds to the reoccurring conflict between the inner savage and the learned citizen. Golding uses the contradiction between the civil selves and evil selves, acting as alter egos, to emphasize their conflict and the boys’ desire and inability to satisfy

Open Document