Dramatic Irony In Oedipus

1410 Words3 Pages

Sophocles’ Oedipus is arguably one of the best tragic heroes in ancient literature, but does he conform to the Aristotelian criteria of tragic heroes? In his work Poetics, Aristotle details the characteristics that must comprise such a character, providing playwrights a strict criterion to follow when writing dramas. One character that is consistently mentioned along with this definition is the notorious Oedipus. Oedipus was the king of Thebes who slowly learned that he was responsible for the death of his father and was married to his own mother. This brief analysis of the text will attempt to argue that Oedipus does indeed meet his standards, specifically through his great flaw, change of fortune, code of ethics and the dramatic irony that …show more content…

He spends time and effort trying to find the culprit, who just so happens to be the investigator. In the end, Oedipus begs for the punishment that the killer should receive, exile. This kind of backwards plot twist keeps the onlooker interested and is a pleasant deviation from normal storylines. Irony also finds its place in the inescapable truthfulness of the prophecies. It would seem as if nothing that Oedipus could do would circumvent the predicted outcomes. As mentioned earlier, when Oedipus was presented with the information that he, as a matter of fact, murdered King Laius, he wouldn’t accept it. The reader (or spectator) also reaches the final conclusion before the main character. Oedipus, as we know, slowly realizes what took place on his journey to Thebes. In spite of the fact that the entire situation isn’t necessarily humorous, it is quite amusing and almost foolish that it takes him so long to understand the …show more content…

In the event that the evidence provided above isn’t enough, a few academics that have the authority to rule on such matters have come to the same conclusion. Bernard Knox, a former Yale professor and director of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies, states in a matter of fact way that Aristotle “clearly regarded” Oedipus “as the most perfect example of the tragic art.” (Knox, 1962, p. 1) The fact that he thought of Sophocles’ work as embodying tragedy to perfection would certainly mean that he executed the persona flawlessly. Even more evident of the conformance to Aristotle’s model is the fact that Sophocles actually held a foundation on the concept that was derivative of the former. (Adade-Yeboah, 2015) If anyone is qualified to classify Oedipus, it is certainly his creator. Furthermore, the Aristotelian tragic hero basically adheres to four basic principles. First, he has a tragic flaw, which could be taken to mean an event that went awry or a fundamental lapse in character. He also passes through a turn of events that leaves him in a worse position that he started. Next, he is morally relatable, landing on neither pole of ethics. Finally, his tale is filled with irony. By conforming to the aforementioned rules, Oedipus is undoubtedly a tragic hero in Aristotle’s

Open Document