Doubting Onesself: An Intertextual Analysis

1146 Words3 Pages

New experiences can create new memories and reflections on which to look back on. A few of those experiences have stayed longer than most. For Emil Sinclair, Demian presents him with a new perspective with which to look at the biblical story of Cain and Abel. Instead of Cain committing a crime, it is a fabricated story made in fear of him due to his intelligence. This new information has a great impact on Sinclair. Recently, I was discussing about university life with a friend. We commented on how all these new experiences can make anyone feel confused or disoriented. He made the remark, “There is nothing wrong with doubting yourself.” Doubting oneself is usually considered a block in the road, yet it can actually be a signal in the road. Self-doubt is the “lack of confidence in the reliability of one's own motives, personality, thought…” (“Self-doubt”). It leaves you with uncertainty of whether you can …show more content…

There is a technique in writing where you write your thoughts down without pausing. As you write you can see them unravel and soon you reach a conclusion; the answer to your problems. A perspective made visible by looking at all the possible choices you can think of. Two minds work better than one though. By speaking to others about your doubts one is able to find a clarity not always made possible by roughing it on your own. Answers that one couldn’t come up with alone are made clear by others because they do not see one’s “failings or uncertainties in the same way [one] does” (Dempsey 4). Learning something new will either cheer you up or disarm you. Sinclair goes through this when Demian tells him of an alternate version for the biblical story of Cain and is in completely disbelief; “I found everything he had said totally unbelievable!” (Hesse 19). The disbelief should encourage you to seek an understanding of this new concept until you are completely sure if you want to accept or reject

Open Document