Divorce Therapy Summary

763 Words2 Pages

The latest findings related to family and couple therapy include in this article reveal information that are relevant for both Christian and Secular counselors and therapist. Some of the current findings on long-term implications for children and families after divorce are as follows.
1. The litigious divorce process often leaves children with parents who are at “war” and have little ability to co-parent effectively.
2. Consequently, children often are left with parents who are hateful to one another and essentially unable to work together (i.e., communicate and make pertinent parenting decisions).
3. Families are left with parents who have high levels of dysfunctional conflict that can leave a lasting mark on children (Johnston & Roseby, …show more content…

The psychotherapist easily can be drawn into the legal system, being called to testify. This can have the consequence of piercing what was expected to be the protected environment of the therapeutic intervention, thereby exposing the child’s comments and emotional experiences and the psychologist to the hostile scrutiny of the courtroom. When this occurs, children can have their feelings, thoughts, and concerns on public display. These children also are subject to retribution from parents who may feel hurt or threatened by hearing testimony that otherwise would not be available to them if they were not litigating

In identify problems or question(s) covered in the research counselors and therapist encounter the following.
1. Court orders finalizing the divorce usually require parental cooperation and collaboration. They are based presumably on the expectation that parents can recover from the battle so they will be able to communicate and work together.
2. Parents may have spent years and much of their savings bitterly fighting with one another, sharing, and perhaps exaggerating, each other’s faults on the record in the public forum of the …show more content…

We would not expect two surgeons who were in a contentious “divorce” in their practice to assist one another in the operating room. Yet we expect parents to work together as the “board of directors” of the family to help their children both cope with the divorce and deal with the other challenges they face. Furthermore, the psychotherapist can unwittingly be put in the position of speculating about the fitness of the parents, which is something well beyond the scope of the treatment and perhaps beyond the scope of the clinician’s skill set, putting the clinician in ethical jeopardy as well (Zimmerman et al.,

Open Document