Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise and fall of communism
Rise and fall of communism
Impact of lenin on russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise and fall of communism
Describing Lenin " A cruel tyrant, bloodthirsty and ruthless in his determination to
seize and hold on to power"
" He devoted his whole life to the interests of working people and to
the building of a better society." Which of these two descriptions of
Lenin do you think is closes to the truth.
After several uprisings, demonstrations and a coup attempt, finally by
mid October 1917 the Bolshevik movement gained pace and the Bolshevik
revolution began between 25-27 October,as a result; the Provisinal
government ministers were arrested and the 2nd Congress of the Soviets
was announced. Lenin, appointed chairman. Later in December, Cheka;
the all Russian Comission against counter-revolution was established.
As the 'dictatorship of the prolatariat' began, so did a new era with
Lenin, which only lasted for few years.
Although it would not be fair calling Lenin a tyrant and a
bloodthirsty man, he and other Bolsheviks have made some mistakes too,
this suggestion can therefore be supported with some evidence, though
only to some extent. Firstly, from this point of view, it could be
firstly said that the execution of Lenin's elder brother, Alexendar,
in 1887 had been a turning point in his life and with his involvement
in an attempt to assasinate the Tsar. This event later on, marked him
as a radical in the authorities view. Many years later from this
event, the April Theses of 3 April 1917, where Lenin called for 'all
powers to the soviets', could also be put forward as an evidence to
this view; saying that this Theses showed Lenin wished to ...
... middle of paper ...
... too much,
devoted to his cause and most importantly an internationalist. The
fact that he even worked for revolution while he was in exile shows
that his real aim was not to be in power but to lead the world to a
socialist path, which he believed was best. As Trotsky had said: " if
the peasants had not read Lenin, Lenin had clearly read the thoughts
of the peasants". He said this refering to his commrade's " Bread,
Peace, Land" slogan , suggesting they promised something for almost
everyone who had been suffering.
To conclude, Lenin had an aim; creating a better society, not causing
the death of over 55,000 people, but even if he knew he would be
called a tyrant or a ruthless, bloodthirsty man, this would not have
effected the way he has acted to reach his aim of creating a better
society for the working people.
that it wasn't the case. He found out that war wasn't all fun and games. What it actually was
In order to establish whether Lenin did, indeed lay the foundation for Stalinism, two questions need to be answered; what were Lenin’s plans for the future of Russia and what exactly gave rise to Stalinism? Official Soviet historians of the time at which Stalin was in power would have argued that each one answers the other. Similarly, Western historians saw Lenin as an important figure in the establishment of Stalin’s socialist state. This can be partly attributed to the prevailing current of pro-Stalin anti-Hitler sentiments amongst westerners until the outbreak of the cold war.
for this similarity is that war, especially long and expensive war, causes fatigue and disdain within a nation. Without a strong leader, the people grow desperate and crave a strong leader. Lenin and Napoleon were also similar in the way they desired to be depicted in the eyes of their people. Both leaders wanted to be seen as strong and powerful leaders, who commanded authority and would bring their respective nations back.
On the whole, does Goodbye, Lenin paint a positive or negative picture of life in communist East Germany?
We have no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire. Our aim is a democratic peace - a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman”- (George W. Bush, 2004). By our military leaders. “Only our individual faith in freedom can keep us free. ”(Eisenhower, 1960)
...a man who thought he was doing the right thing and saving the people from an unjust government; meanwhile, failing to look ahead and see the possible consequences of his monumental decision.
Edward Dunes’ life as a revolutionary during Russia’s transition from a Tsarist state to that of a Marxist-Socialist regime, was propagated by many situational influences/factors stemming from his families relocation from Riga to Moscow. As a young boy in Riga, Dunes’ thirst for books along with a good educational elevated his potential to be a highly skilled worker. Dune’s childhood education coupled with factory life in Moscow along with a subsequent influential individual in his life with his father’s heavy labor socialist views, molded Dune into the Bolshevik revolutionary he became.
Isaac Murrin Mr. J. Pharion Freshman English 20 February 2013 The Similarities and Differences between Lenin and Stalin Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving the Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals.
Hitler got everything he wanted for so long, without even having to resort to force. Lukacs describes Hitler as ''being an amateur at generalship, but he posessed the great professional talent applicable to all human affairs: an understanding of human nature and the understanding of the weaknesses of his opponents. That was enough to carry him very far''(3). Lukacs wants to make that a point in all of his readers' minds; that Hitler could manipulate people so he could get what he wanted without resorting to violence.
of democracy. While he may not have really done it if he had the chance, he wanted to at heart,
On March 3, 1918 Russia lost 1/3 of its fertile farm lands, 1/3 of its
turn the country around and he saw that in order to make gains, at the
Lunch with Lenin is a superb story written by Deborah Ellis. It involves the protagonist, Valerin is a round character and the reader witnesses as he grows up and matures in what seems to be Russia shortly after the end of World War II. The story tells of how Valerin overcomes challenges such as being abandon by his mother and getting picked on at the orphanage. The reader can see that Val is very loyal, brave, and smart just from watching how Valerin deals with growing up. Choices that are made by this unique protagonist are usually wise and well thought out.
The New Economic Policy instituted by Vladimir Lenin in 1922 was seen as a necessary evil in order to maintain power in the Soviet Union. While most historians agree with Lenin’s assessment and believe that without the change the entire Soviet economy would have collapsed there is a wide range of thoughts on the true effectiveness of the NEP. This paper will look at the progression of the NEP and the differing views Bolshevik leaders had on it as well as the perceived effectiveness of the limited free market policies adopted by these socialist leaders. It will also try to determine if NEP could have remained a viable option for the economy long term.
Lenin's Economic Policies in 1924 When the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 they inherited many of the problems faced by the old Tsarist regime as well as those of the Provisional Government after the Tsars abdication. Lenin, as leader of the Bolsheviks took many measures to try and solve these problems, each with varying degrees of success. This essay will, therefore, go on to look at and discuss the various measures that Lenin and the Bolshevik party took, and, whether these measures created more problems for Russia in the end or in fact made significant progress towards the communist society that Lenin had prophesised for Russia. In the early days of Bolshevik rule, there were many problems facing Lenin.