The Romanov family was murdered in a brutal way. On the 17th of July 1918, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, the death of the imperial Romanov family occurred. Awoken in the middle of the night, with the idea of being photographed, the family of seven, a doctor, and 3 servants were taken down to a cellar and there they learned of their fate. On March 15, 1917, a little over a year before their death, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia abdicated the throne. He and his family went under house arrest after his abdication and remained so until their death. Their lives shouldn’t have been taken in the way the they were. Their bodies were disfigured and unrecognizable once the murder was complete; the room of which the assassination occurred was in shambles, and the bodies were thrown into a mine shaft.
Since there weren't any eyewitnesses to the event, many versions of the event say that the family was situated for a photograph when the door to the cellar room opened. That may or may not have been the case. One guard named Kleshchev watched the leader of the murder, Yakov Yurovsky, lead the family into ...
With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.
Tsar Nicholas II was a family man who put his family before the wellbeing of the country. In the Bloody Sunday scene thousands of people were marching to the Winter Palace to request help and protection from the Tsar because he was supposed to be in St Petersburg. However he was not there, he had gone home to tend to his son because he was ill. This resulted in the massacring of approximately 200 people who meant no harm . After his abdication in a conversation with his son Alexi he tells him that he abdicated for him. He tells Alexi, “I didn't want you to pay for my mistakes.” Whether this was the reason for his abdication or not the movie led the viewers to believe that everything he did was for his family. The leader of a country should make decisions that will be better for the country, not their family. He put the wellbeing of his family before the country which shows inadequate leadership that ultimately led to the collapse of the old reg...
I can use this source in my research project to defend why Czar Nicholas II is innocent to the abuse of power of the office of Czar.It reveales to me that even thouch Nicholas struggled with being the new Czar he truly did a lot for Russia to improve in learning abilities.Above all else, Nicholas loved Russia first and then his family; He thought the fate of the two was inseparable. No one knew the fault of the Romanov Dynasty better than him. Czar Nicholas sincerely felt his responsibility for the country, He thought that his destiny was within the country he ruled. I think it was really difficult for him but it was the only way to admit his mistakes and to say "sorry" to his people.
Not only did the Romanov family have to go through a terrible death sentence, but they were ridiculed and belittled at almost every possible chance along the way by the Bolsheviks. They were forced to live in awful conditions, to be tormented because of vicious gossip and rumors, and to find a way to keep their faith when they had no opportunity. The Russian Imperial family had to endure all of this and more, just because of their bad luck and poor judgment.
The reader have probably wondered how different the life would be, if one day one could have followed his desires? If spontaneously, leaving his routine life behind one could have finally discovered a long awaited feeling of delight?!
In mid-19th century Russia, an oppressive rule is a result of the Romanov monarchy and this in... ... middle of paper ... ... ition to being important in portraying Raskolnikov's changing personality. By making such dissimilarity between the two ways that the two characters affect Raskolnikov, we are able to see his downfall and subsequent rise much more clearly.
What the Bolsheviks did in reaction to the threat to their power, was they put the royal family under house arrest in the house of special purposes. They tried to make the life for the tsar’s family as miserable as possible. “For two weeks the former Emperor had been asking – just a single window, just a little fresh air, that was all the former tsar wanted for his family, but the Bolshevik denied.” (Pg. 8) Of course the Bolsheviks weren’t just content with keeping the Romanovs under house arrest they wanted them dead. “that gave the Bolshevik the excuse they had been seeking…” (Pg.128) The quote is referencing to when they find the note behind the toilet to give them an excuse to kill them. The Bolsheviks wanted so badly to kill them because there was the looming threat of the white army saving the tsar and restoring his power in the
The Bolshevik overthrow of the Romanov family line in Imperial Russia during World War I is
Bolsheviks. Inserting pieces of information from the archives in Moscow are crucial to understanding Leonka’s motivations for helping the royal family and also to understanding their troubles.
Romanov, Olga Nikolaevna. The Diary of Olga Romanov: Royal Witness to the Russian Revolution: With Excerpts from Family Letters and Memoirs of the Period. Trans. Helen Azar. Yardley, Pennsylvania: Westholme, LLC, 2014. Print.
In 1934, Sergey Kirov a rival to Stalin was murdered. Stalin is believed to have been behind the assassination, he used it as a pretext to arrest thousands of his other opponents who in his words might have been responsible for Kirov’s murder. These purges not only affected those who openly opposed Stalin but ordinary people too. During the rule of Stain o...
the damage that the Tsar had done to the country. This was a huge task
We are all condemned to death; it is inescapable. Even if a person doesn’t believe in the concept of destiny, it is undeniable that every person is fated to die at some point. Most people, however, are not aware of when exactly the inevitable will approach. Often in works of fiction, the reader, or sometimes even the character, is aware of their fate. There are many different understandings of destiny, which is one of the reasons why it has played such a large role in so many different literary works throughout the world and history. Fate is one of the principal literary devices used in Homer’s epic poem, The Iliad, Shakespeare’s tragic play, Antony and Cleopatra, and Tolstoy’s pedagogical novella, The Death of Ivan Ilych.
The last time I have written in here was when I still had the hope and expectations that things would get better. In fact, things have only gotten worse from here on. A few months ago, Feodor and I had married in the local church a few miles south from my family’s home, and we have settled in a small hut a street across the school where he is teaching. Our home is falling apart, too cold and not insulated properly for the winter, and the furniture all falling apart, yet it is still better than nothing. To be honest, we were extremely lucky to still have been able to find a home and barely get to feed ourselves, even a small plate that both Feodor and I scrape clean, yet he is always generous and selfless to offer all of it to me because we are expecting a child.
To many individuals the word “progress” has a positive meaning behind it. It suggests improvement, something humans have been obsessed with since the dawn of society. However, if closely examined, progress can also have a negative connotation as well. While bringing improvement, progress can simultaneously spark conformity, dependency, and the obsession of perfection within the individuals caught in its midst. It is this aspect of progress within modern society that negatively affects Ivan Ilych, Leo Tolstoy’s main character in The Death of Ivan Ilych. Ivan’s attempt to conform to modern society’s view of perfection takes away his life long before he dies. Furthermore, his fear of death and reactions towards it reflects modern society’s inability to cope with the ever present reminder that humans still suffer and die, despite all attempts to make life painless, perfect, and immortal.