Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An Ethical Analysis of The Prince by Machiavelli
Machiavelli the prince leadership qualitie 5
Machiavelli s beliefs on leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An Ethical Analysis of The Prince by Machiavelli
In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he gives advice to princes who are to be the future leaders and how to be successful. He does not tell them exactly how to lead but more of how to keep the people from going against you and how to keep their loyalty. He also states how in politics, a Prince can do what needs to be done to get the results in which he desires.
In The Prince, he states that a Prince should want to be merciful and not cruel. Even though they should be merciful, they should also be aware of people trying to abuse the mercy the Prince has to offer. Those who wreck disorder in only a few scenarios are more merciful than those who let the events play out and allow bloodshed. It will be impossible, however, for a new Prince to not be known for cruelty. When they come into power, these new states are filled with danger. This new Prince must not rush into his new state of power. He should not be so easy to believe or set things into motion, but he should show carefulness around
…show more content…
However, it has been seen that a Prince who has not held his word and has outwitted other by his cunningness, have accomplished many things than those who were trusted for their honesty. He states that a Prince should be both a lion and a fox (3). A Prince should be as strong as a lion and wise like a fox. One cannot just rely on being a lion, but he must rely on both the lion and the fox to keep the peace. Not everyone will be faithful to the Prince and in return, he does not need to be faithful to them. A Prince also does not need to have all excellent traits. He is allowed to show his merciful, humane and religious side, but he is also allowed to show the sides that contradict these traits in order to keep a balance. He gives an example of a present day Prince who preaches and practices both peace and good faith, and due to this lost his authority and his kingdom
A prince should still not worry about his reputation, and be cruel when necessary to others versus showing mercy to everyone. For example, if you let a few bad citizens go without punishment, they will continue to hurt the rest of the people in one way or another. If you choose to punish one or a small group of people who do harm to the community, less people will be hurt in the long run. Furthermore, every prince should be somewhat feared by his people. If you are not feared, as well as show too much compassion, then you will not be
The bravery and strength of the lion will not be enough to empower the ruler to escape the snares set by his enemies for and the slyness of the fox is also needed. “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” (The Prince) It is not possible for the citizens to love and fear a prince, but being feared is much safer than being loved.“Since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved” (The Prince) Everything a prince says must be filled with these five qualities: being merciful,being trustworthy, religious,kind, honest. Machiavelli defines virtues as qualities that are praised by others, such as generosity, compassion, and piety. He argues that a prince should always try to appear virtuous, but it is more important for the prince to be practical than it is for him to be morally good. The government that is built of this foundation it
One of the key chapters in “The Prince” is “Of Cruelty and Clemency and Whether it is Better to be
In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli writes a detailed guide for a ruler, or a prince, to follow to ensure stable and controlled civilian population. Throughout his writing, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the interests of the rulers. Although he does not say it outright, the audience can see that Machiavelli believes that the wellbeing of the people is important. The wellbeing of the people in the principality is important to a prince so that he can effectively and efficiently rule.
The prince’s demand to behave towards nobles negatively gave approval to how they are biased against him. He needs to learn to be able to tie their fortunes to his own. Nonetheless, the particular independents may be of two kinds. Their freedom comes from an absence of bravery to join themselves together to the prince’s purpose, in which they may be passed down and recognized for their helping hand; or they are free because they have their own deadlines and strong desires for success in mind. In this particular case, the prince must be careful of them as possible
All about a prince is the danger of death. This danger may come from treason within his government, war with foreign enemies, or a rebellion of his people. The situation is always kill-or-be-killed, and the Fifth Commandment - "Thou shalt not kill." - is discarded before it is ...
The subject of human nature has great emphasis in “The Prince”. Human beings are viewed as rational decision makers who try to maximize their self-interest. They are inclined to help whoever will give them the most benefits and by definition, may easily betray someone to whom they were previously loyal seeing a better opportunity. A large part of being a prince or a politician is being able to lead people, and therefore it is of utter importance in how to deal with their behavior. “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will fin...
Throughout The Prince Machiavelli gives definite instructions as to how a prince should and should not behave which often conforms to the traditional image of men as being tough
Additionally, The Prince states that secular forms of government are more realistic than pious ones because a pious government would be bound by morals. In the Prince, Machiavelli tries to convey that the end justifies the means, which means any thing goes. He claims that it would be ideal for a prince to possess all the qualities that are deemed good by other men, but states that no leader can accomplish that. He also states that the security of the state should be the prince’s first priority and it must be protected by any means necessary. Although, this can be true in certain cases, Machiavelli uses it as an excuse to use evil and cruel tactics.
They were all very true and I certainly agree with most of it. It reminds me of the phrase, “with great power comes great responsibilities”, and while I do not condone violence nor the obsession of one, to remain in a position of power, I certainly do no object to the idea that many inhumane things need to be done in order for power to be kept. Crude power as presented in The Prince, requires that one be vicious, merciless, feared and respected. We are often told that, in life, we must do whatever is necessary to reach our goals. Why should the attention of power be any
Another topic he covers is cruelty, if cruelty is used in the right way the prince will gain much respect and it will preserve a prince’s safety or will help secure the state; it is safer for a prince to be feared than it is for him to be loved because no one will listen or respect a leader who they take to be a joke. Men fear punishment, and this can be used to a prince’s advantage. Men will not disobey if there is a chance of them being killed or thrown in
Although Machiavelli gives numerous points on what it takes to excel as a prince, he also shows some raw examples of how he feels a prince should act in order to achieve maximum supremacy. First, when he says, "ought to hold of little account a reputation for being mean, for it is one of those vices which will enable him to govern" proves Machiavelli feels mighty adamant about his view that being mean will help a prince achieve success (332). It is absurd to imagine the meanest prince as the most successful. Also, when Machiavelli states, "our experience has been that those princes who have done great things have held good faith of little account, and have known how to circumvent the intellect of men by craft" revealing his attitude to manipulate people into fearing and respecting the prince (335). Also, Machiavelli shows that for a prince to be successful, he must not think about good faith.
Niccoló Machiavelli claims in “The Qualities of the Prince” that a prince must have certain qualities that will allow him to seize and maintain his power as a ruler. Machiavelli asserts that these qualities will guarantee the ruler to be able to govern his subjects effectively. According to him, a prince must study the art of war, must understand generosity and to what extent he must be generous to be effective, must choose to either be loved or feared, and be able to keep his word to his citizens according to the situation. These qualities can still apply in today’s politics, and will be useful for a modern time politician as long as they are used carefully.
feel that a Prince should mistreat the citizens. This suggestion is only to serve the Prince's best interests.
In his book, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli outlines many characteristics that he thinks an ideal prince should have. A true ruler, according to Machiavelli, looks out for his own good as well as the welfare of his country, even if that requires him to resort to deceitful means. There are many examples of Machiavellian princes in literature and one such example is Denethor, Steward of Gondor. In this paper I will first clarify a few quotes from The Prince, and then describe how Denethor fits the requirement for being a true prince, according to Machiavelli.