Criticism Of Feminism In A Doll's House

1505 Words7 Pages
A Doll’s House: Final Unit Essay

Feminism is defined as the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. Chosen as 2017’s “Word of the Year” by Merriam-Webster, feminism is a topic that has sparked many debates and discussions. Women, in particular, have been fighting for equality for centuries. Until recently, women were viewed as men’s property and were denied certain rights and freedoms. Feminists around the world turned to literature to advance their perspectives. One play commonly cited as a feminist text is A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen. Written in the Victorian Era, Ibsen’s play describes the struggles of a woman who desired to step outside society’s conventions. Although Ibsen argued that his work was exclusively
…show more content…
Both have committed crimes against the law for reasons that were forgivable. Despite this, as Krogstad says to Nora, “The law cares nothing about motives” (Ibsen 33). Krogstad seeks redemption in order to be welcomed back into society, whereas Nora seeks a way out. Nineteenth-century society was more accepting of male criminals, considering that women would receive more backlash for their illegal behaviors. In A Doll’s House, Nora mulled over the reality of committing suicide to avoid the consequences of saving her husband’s life and sparing her father of unnecessary stress. This drastic measure illustrates the risks of defying societal norms. Both Nora and Krogstad were sacrificial characters; Krogstad was willing to abandon everything for a position at the bank, while Nora contemplated leaving her children behind in order to move on with her life. Krogstad served as an instigator for the plot of Ibsen’s play, thrusting Nora’s dishonesty to Torvald into the spotlight. He was one of the direct causes of the fallout between Nora and Torvald, and in this, catalyzed Nora’s decision to leave her life behind. In an incidental way, Krogstad aided Nora in realizing her lack of power in her own marriage. Comprehending that she is not seen as equal to her husband, Nora choose to become independent in a society that viewed women as inferior. The choice to write Nora as a…show more content…
The true meaning of A Doll’s House is intertwined in the dramatization of Ibsen’s two main female protagonists. Like Krogstad, Nora’s friend Mrs. Linde pursued a life within society’s boundaries. She took on a predominantly male role as a provider when she chose to enter the workforce. As a woman who had no other option but to marry when she was younger, Mrs. Linde was able to make a living for herself after the death of her spouse. Then, as a widow, she was granted more chances to become self-supporting. Alternatively, Mrs. Linde could have remarried and continued a cycle of dependency, but decided to work for the benefit of herself and those around her. Consequently, Mrs. Linde’s introduction into working is feminist because she was given the opportunity to provide for herself. Her actions were atypical of women in the nineteenth century, and portrayed a future where both genders are able to work equally. Also, Mrs. Linde was a reflection for Nora; she symbolized a version of Nora that was capable and self-reliant. Likewise, Torvald, Nora’s husband, exemplified the epitome of his gender. He unabashedly believed in societal roles and applied those rules to his own marriage accordingly. Torvald restricted Nora from reaching her full potential as a wife and a human being. Nora was his doll, a manipulatable plaything stuck in a home she was not allowed to leave. Above all, Torvald
Open Document