Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection about observational learning
Discussion of observational learning. essay
Strengths and weaknesses of observational learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection about observational learning
Assignment B: Observational Learning and Creativity
Creative thinking is an essential tool of traditional artists. In order to gain recognition or be considered successful in the modern world, artisans must search for original ideas where few remain, develop unconventional procedures, and images that have not been constructed several times prior. They must present visual information in an appealing perspective or manner, as well as distinguish themselves from competition. Their job demands inspiration, imagination, and critical thinking. However, not everyone that desires to become an artist is extremely creative, or even a little; this inconvenience causes difficulties in art creation, and ultimately results in the failure of the profession. Although creativity found within an individual is heavily determined by environmental factors and genetics (Tavris & Wade, 2012, p. 256), people can enhance their creativity through observational learning (Groenedijk, Janssen, Rijlaarsdam, & Bergh, 2013) and other methods.
Creativity
“Creative thinking requires [one] to associate elements of a problem in new ways by finding unexpected connections among them” (Tavris & Wade, 2012, p. 256). Individuals with higher creativity utilize divergent thinking over convergent thinking; this thought process depends on a deeper exploration of common ideas to find other available explanations, procedures, or answers. Divergent thinkers interpret information while applying imagination, instead of “following a particular set of steps that [are thought to] converge” (Tavris & Wade, 2012, p. 256) on the correct answer.
High levels of creativity are not connected to higher intelligence, but appear to be affiliated with specific personality traits; those tha...
... middle of paper ...
...o Groenedijk, Janssen, Rijlaarsdam, and Bergh's experiment, those with high aptitudes learn better from watching and listening to others complete a task than through direct strategy instruction. Creative thinking is a process that needs to be nurtured, is not solely hereditary, and can be improved with determination and diligent work.
Works Cited
Groenedijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bergh, H. (2013). Learning to be creative. The effects of observational learning on students' design products and processes. Learning and Instruction, 28, 35-47.
Helson, R., Roberts, B., & Agronick, G. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173-1183.
Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (2012). Invitation to psychology: 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shaughnessy, M. F., & Wakefield, J. F. (2003). Creativity: Assessment. In N. Piotrowski & T. Irons-Georges (Eds.), Magill's encyclopedia of social science:Psychology (pp. 459-463). Pasadena, CA: Salem Press.
DEVELOPMENT. In developing the PCA, test author used 2 kinds of creativeness, one depending on J. P. Guilford's idea of divergent (versus.convergent) thinking along with the other depending on Teresa Amabile's inclusion of social and atmosphere factors in creativeness. Following Guilford, test author defines divergent production as 'the generation of options to satisfy specified broad requirements' (examiner's manual, p. 2). Both divergent-thinking subtests apply Guilford's concept by getting students to (a) complete eight pictures depending on incomplete figures, and (b) on two separate exercises of 20 geometric figures, identify just as much groups of three or higher figures as possible depending on some common feature. The eight completed sketches are each acquired for four from six divergent techniques recognized by Guilford (sensitivity to problems, originality, redef...
In their article, “The Creativity Crisis”, authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman explore the urgency of the downfall in the public’s “creativity quotient.” Bronson and Merryman emphasize the necessity for young children to be imaginative. Through an IBM poll, they verify that with the decrease of creativity in our society comes an array of consequences seen in the work field. The authors remind readers of another reason for the importance of creativity; they argue that creative ideas can solve national matters. Hence, Branson and Merryman believe that original ideas are key for a better world. Though I concede that creativity is a vital key to the solution of many national problems, I still insist that teaching creativity,
"I believe you don't grow into creativity, we grow out of it, or rather get educated out of it." Once a year one thousand remarkable people gather in Monterey, California to exchange something of incalculable value, their ideas: Sir Ken Robinson is one of those remarkable people. During his talk Robinson takes the opportunity to “pin his audience to the wall” while talking about his views and ideas on education. Robinson is a talented author as well, in his latest book he talks about natural talent. There is a point in the book when he says, “The element is the point at which natural talent meets personal passion. When people arrive at the element, they feel most themselves and most inspired and achieve at their highest levels.” And during his speech he makes it clear that our education system is stunting our children’s creativity, therefore preventing them from achieving their very best. Ken Robinson speaks out of a true passion for education and his thoughts on the ideas that, though born with a true sense of creativity, as we age our education makes no room for our creative side to truly blossom and grow into something special.
In conclusion to some up this essay the term ‘creativity’ will always cause a debate in the educational system as. There will always be difficulty defining it as many use the term too loosely to have a definitive meaning. It requires risk taking, it is difficult to portray creativity when schools are so obsessed with right or wrong answers for ways of doing things. Society teaches us the risks are bad because the government and its policies interfere with our own choices and decisions.
To get better education, thinking and learning power comes from our hearts and minds. As Ho says in the article “We Should Cherish Our Children Freedom to Think,” American schools provide opportunities to students and a path to achieve their creativity, which “people tend to dismiss or take for granted” (2007, p.113). Moreover, he also raised a question if American education system is so wretchedly lower in merit, “why is it that this is still the country of innovation” (Ho, P.113)? Kie Ho believes that creativity and freedom to think is the essential part in American education system. If students use critical thinking skill to develop creativity, they can better understand the material and evaluate their own behavior and characteristics. In many other countries, education inhibited the children’s freedom to think and that repressed the development of students’ activities.
Before discussing any more, clarity toward the term “creativity” should be defined. “[Creativity] is extraord...
Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., … Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906–1917. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.015
At the turn of the century, and more recently, problem solving took first place along with creative thinking (Gruber, 2011). This essay will prove that the current education system tends to eventually pull children away from creativity. It will demonstrate how there is a greater amount of creativity in younger children as opposed to older children. This will be shown through the theories of Howard Gardner and Jean Piaget. In order to prove that education has moved away from a creative focus, this essay will examine the three phases of creativity, multiple intelligences and the U-shaped curve by Gardner, as well as Piaget’s constructivist theory and beliefs on retrogression, which is the idea of growing to show how we eventually pull away from visual art (Nolley, 2010).
Creative potential is the ability to create something novel and valuable, whereas creative achievement is accomplishing something real like discovering something scientific. Creative potential can be measures by tests that measure thinking processes (Runco 2010), for example the Torrance test of Creativity. Divergent thinking can be defined as ‘the kind that goes off to different directions’ (Guilford 1959 p381). Divergent thinking tests can include open thinking questions that lead to different solutions. Whereas creative achievement can be assessed by self-reports such as biographical questionnaires where participants state their achievements throughout diverse situations (music, art). For example, the Creative Achievement Questionnaire (Carson et al, 2005). This questionnaire and other related measures were able to find a relationship between intelligence and creativity and it is suggested that CAQ could predict intelligence levels. In addition, meta-analytic findings show that there is in fact a correlation between creative potential and intelligence and it is usually around
There is a magnitude of research put behind trying to find the link between creativity and...
There is an overwhelming amount of evidence of the human race realtion to, creativity and that we all have an interest in education. Education is so important to us because it is the only thing we can use for this unpredicted future. All children have talents, but the education system crushes our creativity because we are taught to think a certain way. Due to the fear of being wrong has led children to no longer be creative which is why many adults lose that “capacity” to be able to be creative. The very few children who are allowed to continue using their creativity tend to not to be as dissatisfied their lives as much as other adults who were not able to pursue passions they truly enjoyed.
To begin with Sir Ken Robinson states that “creativity is the greatest gift of human intelligence” and therefore the education system should help children to realise their creative potential, unfortunately many are being displaced from their own true talents. Formal instructions and inquiry based learning are essential for creative education. There are some times when it is appropriate for the teacher to give formal instruction in skills a...
Herein lies the problem. The children that we are educated are and will be faced with new challenges that current education systems all over the world have been failing to meet. It would seem that structures of mass domain education suppress the innately imprinted creativity found in every living person and widely known specialist on the subject, Sir Ken Robinson, goes as far as saying that we are, “educating people out of their creativity” (Giang, 2013). But if the school system is to make adjustments to explore and cultivate creativity more how are they to do so without losing total structure? Robinson acknowledges this by saying that, “in every creative approach some of the things we’re looking for are hard, if not impossible to quantify. But that doesn’t mean that they don’t matter.”
They also keep their minds open to new solutions, so that at any moment they can change to a different resolution that could be easier to complete. This extreme level of creativity allows them to solve problems and resolve issues much easier and much more efficiently (“Thinking Strategies”).