Conscription Argumentative Analysis

998 Words2 Pages

The attitudes of individuals at the time of WWI towards conscription, created an extreme diversity and difference of opinions. Prime Minister of Australia at the time, Billy Hughes called for conscription, even though conscription was opposed by his own party, the Labor Party. The contrasting and diverse views of Conscription were argued between Leaders of Politics and Business against the views of Farmers and Trade Workers. Some Australian’s believed that it was a man’s duty to fight for his country while others believed no citizen should be forced to fight under “Totalitarianism.” As WWI went on, the enlistment of Australian troops declined as more Australian citizens became opposed to the fighting. The British Government were pressuring …show more content…

This became an issue for the Australian Government, who realised that they would eventually need more support on the front lines. A divisive public appeal began by the Australian Government led by Prime Minister Hughes to allow Conscription. “Billy Hughes decided to take the issue to the people in a referendum,” (Australian War Memorial, 2016,) to see if they should compel Australian men to serve in the war. At this time many forms of campaigning were made including the 1916 Conscription Badge “This is a pro-conscription badge for the campaign leading up to the vote and it says ‘Yes, for Australia and the Anzacs.” (Brown, 2007.) The referendum was acted upon on 28th October, 1916. Hughes asked the people of Australia during this time whether the government should have compulsory power over citizens in regard to requiring them for military. “The people of Australia are about to decide the destiny of their country. They must declare that they stand loyally by the Empire and their kinsmen. I ask them to prove in this referendum whether they want to be their own masters, or slaves.” (Museum of Australian Democracy, 2016.) Many people at the time disproved this statement as they wanted to make their own decisions. The First Referendum on Conscription was “narrowly defeated” with 51% voting against Conscription. As a result of this Hughes was expelled from his

Open Document