Comparison Of Piano In D. H. Lawrence's Piano

1086 Words3 Pages

Often it can be found that less is more. Less talking leads to more listening. Less spending leads to more saving. In the case of D.H. Lawrence's rendition of his own poem Piano, less writing leads to a more centralized idea, and therefore a greater emphasis of this message. While perfection is never guaranteed, Lawrence uses time and alterations to clarify the meaning behind his work in Piano. Therefore, in his revision of Piano, by omitting components of his first trial, Lawrence is able to emphasize the speaker’s connection to the past in contrast to the betrayal of the present. While the first version of Piano had more length, this also meant that it had more room for unnecessary information. This held true and led to situations that distracted the reader from the …show more content…

This version focused more on the speaker and his internal struggles. This developed the speaker more in depth than the first version, which in turn created a connection between the audience and the speaker. Part of this connection is developed through the use of the introduction. In the first version, the introduction is long and somewhat misleading. In the second, the work starts with a sense of tranquility, which is consistent with the impact the past has on the speaker. This encompasses the entirety of the message and therefore begins the description of the past in the light that it is meant to be explained in. Whereas in the first version, the past is described initially as hidden, torn, faded, and hollow. This completely contrasts the soft, tingling, smiling, coziness, and sense of belonging that the second version ensues. The second also provides more of an analysis of the pain that the present forces on the speaker. For example, in the second the speaker is described as betrayed back to the present. This clarified his true desire to lie in the past, where he could find the comfort of

Open Document