Comparison Of Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee And Dances With Wolves

674 Words2 Pages

Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee and Dances With Wolves: Are The Similarities Greater Than The Differences? The 1990’s through the 2000’s were a golden age for historical film making. Two films, though, defied usual historical films. Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee and Dances With Wolves are great examples of this. These two movies are no doubt similar in many ways, and not only earned their place in records, but in people’s hearts. Although the two films have similar settings and similar time settings. Dances with wolves takes place in 1863, while Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee takes place at 1860. However, all movies can’t be the same. John Dunbar from Dances With Wolves is not a real character, …show more content…

Both of these movies have similar time periods, and give you a great outlook on the Native American way of life. John Dunbar (Dances With Wolves) is a soldier who has been honored for his courage, and has been allowed to be posted on any outpost he desires. He chooses an outpost on the frontier, which confuses many of his fellow soldiers. At this time, Indians still roamed the frontier, and it was a very barren place. Due to unfortunate events on the journey, the only two people who know of his location are gone. John Dunbar seeks refuge in a small abandoned outpost and waits for the soldiers to arrive. As days and days go on, he starts to give up hope that anyone will be coming at all. In the middle of the state of perish, he makes contact with an Indian, Kicking Bird. Kicking bird had discovered John’s camp, and wanted to steal Cisco, his horse. Luckily Dunbar scared him away, and saved his horse. The setting is Western, just like Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee. Charles Eastman (Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee) is a former Sioux tribe member, but has been raised as if he has been a white man for almost his whole life. As Charles later becomes a doctor, he tries to fight for him and his people’s

Open Document