Comparing The Great Gatsby And A Streetcar Named Desire

950 Words2 Pages

Illusive Natures in The Great Gatsby and A Streetcar Named Desire Illusive natures and concealment of a person’s true identity are often evidenced in modern literature and even through our personal lives. Judy Garland, a renowned actress, once claimed, “How strange once an illusion dies. It’s as though you’ve lost a child.” It can be inferred from this that destructive circumstances result because of an illusive nature. This idea is clearly illustrated in both A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. The lead protagonists, Blanche Dubois and Jay Gatsby, in both texts put on a facade. Their illusive natures are depicted through their personal possessions (important literary symbols), mysterious …show more content…

These objects are the rhinestone tiara and her various accouterments (clothes she possess). Stanley Kowalski mentions to Stella Kowalski: “And diamonds! A crown for an empress!” (Williams 36) Blanche fools Stanley and other people by creating an aura of sophistication, in reality the tiara was from a costume ball and wasn’t real diamond. This aura of sophistication that Blanche creates is also witnessed in the concluding scene when Blanche states: “It’s Della Robbia blue. The blue of the robe in the old Madonna pictures.” (Williams 135) This is in response to Stella and Eunice who claimed that the jacket was lilac and blue. Blanche was appalled by this and corrected them. Blanche tells them that the robe is similar to what Madonna wore, thus creating that aura of sophistication. Blanche relates herself to Madonna – someone who’s sophisticated – because that’s the kind of person that Blanche wants to be connected to. In reality both the tiara and the jacket are deceptive, creating false images. This illustrates that despite the ordeal that Blanche went through (Harold Mitchell deserted her and Stanley abused her) she still surrounded herself with the illusory image at the end of the play (she was still the same person and hadn’t changed). Similarly, as the Old-Eyed man observes: “They used to go there by the hundreds!” (Fitzgerald 187) It depicts how lonely Gatsby was at the end and …show more content…

Gatsby does so by changing his name and concealing how he earns his wealth. As Nick Carraway observes: “James Gatz – that was really, or at least legally, his name. He had changed it at the age of seventeen…” (Fitzgerald 105) Gatsby changed his name because he didn’t wanted to be connected with his past and wanted to avoid it. He didn’t want people to know that he came from a despondent background (his parents were farmers). He wanted people to think that he was “old money” so that he could win Daisy’s affection. By changing his name people weren’t aware of his meagre past because he wasn’t born into a wealthy family. There were also numerous rumors affiliated with Gatsby such as him being Kaiser Wilhelm’s nephew because people don’t know how he acquired his wealth. Tom also states that, “A lot of these newly rich people are just big bootleggers, you know.” (Fitzgerald 115) This proves that it’s inevitable that the past will be revealed and that Tom is aware that Gatsby didn’t inherit his money but is earning it dishonestly. This shatters the illusion that Gatsby has tried too hard to

Open Document