The Imperfect Utopia of The Chrysalids and 1984 Many societies, whether fictional or non-fictional, aim to create a utopian society. However, what makes a utopian society? A utopia is defined as an ideal place or state, bearing systems of political and social perfection. The two societies in John Wyndham’s The Chrysalids and George Orwell’s 1984 attempt to create a utopia, but establish a very distorted version of a utopia. Both societies blindly conform to the principles of a keystone figure, manipulate events in order to better reflect the figure, and exterminate those who oppose the leader and stall the development of the ‘utopia’. First off, both societies conform to the principle of the ruling figure without question – despite the presence …show more content…
This is shown through each society’s lack of understanding about their past – however, the little details that they know of reflect current fundamentals (or the formation of such), which may signal a change in historical records. In The Chrysalids, society firmly believes that the people of the past were allegedly wiped out by a phenomenon called ‘Tribulation’ (“…the wonderful world that the Old People lived in, as it had been before God sent Tribulation [Wyndham 5]). This passage shows that past events have been created by God, and has helped shape today’s society. A similar belief can be seen in 1984, where society’s foundation is credited to Big Brother (with no reference to events prior to society’s creation): “He tried to remember in what year he had first heard mention of Big Brother… it was impossible to be certain. In the Party histories, of course, Big Brother figured as the leader and guardian of the Revolution since its… earliest days.” (Orwell 38) – this is another example of history being altered by superiors (also known as the Party), as “[n]othing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right” (Orwell 162). However, in the event that something contradictory to common belief is found within society, other society members cover it up. In …show more content…
All potential threats to the utopia are recognized by each society. For example, the Waknuk society has a “sharp eye for the odd, or the unusual” (Wyndham 5) – an example of a person displaying these qualities is Joseph Strorm, who “was a careful… man with a keen eye for an Offence” (Wyndham 5); everyone in the society is always on the lookout for anything that goes against God’s word. In 1984, society’s citizens are watched by their version of Waknuk’s ‘keen eye’, the Thought Police. In this society, “there was… no way of knowing whether you were watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire” (Orwell 5) – meaning that all citizens are always watched for any action that goes against Big Brother’s ‘wisdom’. In the event that a defector is discovered, both societies have measures put in place to ensure that the defector is excluded from society. In The Chrysalids, society’s defectors (Deviations) are sent away to the Fringes, disowned from society, and put at a disadvantage. “The people of the Fringes… they were really Deviations… these people… had very little where they lived in their border country” (Wyndham 20). This passage implies that
In all aspects a utopian society is a society that is place to achieve perfection, and that is the society that both the “Uglies”, by Scott Westfield and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, was striving for. In both of these stories, the government had control over the people’s choices, freedoms, and their natural abilities. Yet both government strive for a perfect society, the methods they use to achieve this goal were different from each other.
A comparison of life in London, Air Strip One (or Great Britain) in the George Orwell novel '1984' and Waknuk, Canada in the John Wyndham novel 'The Chrysalids.' Waknuk is a society living after a nuclear attack. The people of Air Strip One (or Britain) in 1984 live in a dictatorship controlled by "The Party".
Between the poem, ¨ No one died in Tiananmen Square¨ by William Lutz and the novel, 1984 by George Orwell there are multiple similarities. Subjects such as their government, their denial of history, and the use of doublethink and re-education are all parallel between the novel and the poem. For instance, both the governments have a highly strict government. Their governments are so controlling of their people that they use brute force in order to help re-educate them. For example, in 1984 the main character, Winston Smith was trying to go against their government, The Party, and because he tries to do so, he is placed in The Ministry of Love and brutally beaten by the man whom he assumed was a part of the Brotherhood, O'Brien. O'Brien claimed
The authors therefor saw the ‘utopian’ societies to be a trap for weak minded publics, and that once in place, such systems would be able to perpetuate indefinitely due to the efficiency at which they protect and propagate themselves. Through fear, diversion and sedation the utopia can maintain a strong grip on the people it encompasses before anyone realizes the sacrifices made. The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however. The state of people is not about to change, and their ignorance will continue regardless of the harshness of the wake up calls issued.
Utopia is a term invented by Sir Thomas More in 1515. However, he traces the root two Greek words outopia and eutopia which means a place does not exist and a fantasy, invention. It is widely accepted that Plato was to first to picture a utopian order. In his masterpiece, “Republic”, he formed the principles of ideal commonsense and his utopia (Hertzler, 1922:7). After the classical age, Sir Thomas More assumed to be the first of the utopian writers in early modern period. As a humanist, he gave the world in his “Utopia” a vision of a perfect communistic commonwealth (the history of utopian thought). Utopia’s influence on contemporary and rival scholars is so deep that it has given its name to whole class of literature. Following the appearance of More’s Utopia, there was a lack of Utopian literature for nearly a century (Hertzler, 1922:7). This period ended with the works of Francis Bacon, Campanelle and Harrington. These early modern utopians, being the children of Renaissance, filled with a love of knowledge and high respect for the newly truths of science. Thus, they believed that the common attainment of knowledge means the largest participation of all members of society in its joys and benefits. After the period of early Utopians, continuation of a sprit of French Revolution and initial signs of industrial revolution resulted in the emergence of a new group of Utopians called Socialist Utopians (Hertzler, 1922: 181). The word “Socialism” seems to have been first used by one of the leading Utopian Socialists, St Simon. In politics utopia is a desire that never come true neither now nor afterwards, a wish that is not based on social forces (material conditions and production) and is not supported by the growth and development of political, class forces. This paper discusses the validity of this claim, tries to present and evaluate the political reforms, if any, offered by Socialist Utopians.
North Korea, China, and even Cuba are similar to 1984. They try to control their people just the same as in 1984, and just like in Jonestown. The only people who were free in 1984 were the Proles. The community in Jonestown began as everyone wanting to be there, and then as conditions worsened the people wanted to leave. They were not allowed to, much like 1984. The people in both situations are similar, in that they are oppressed by their governments, but only the people in Jonestown are given the ability to think they are even able to
The definition of Utopia is, “an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.” The rules and controls listed above and the many more that are in the book “Anthem” describe a society trying to become collective but in a utopian way. The purpose of these rules and controls is to keep the society collectivist. Fear is what runs this society. “.
A “utopia is that which is in contradiction with reality,” said the famous French novelist Albert Camus in his collection of essays, Between Hell and Reason. History shows us that seemingly exemplary ideals in practice have led to the collapse of societies. Just examine the two most prominent attempts at a utopia: Hitler’s attempt to socialize all of Europe and create the “perfect” Aryan race coupled with Karl Marx’s beliefs to instate communism into society. The final result was the destruction of their perspective visionary worlds. There was one major facet that prevented these two from creating their paradigms: utopias take away individual freedom and identity and therefore society cannot exist. Aldous Huxley’s science fiction novel Brave New World examines the large disconnect between the future and present day societies, showing how several aspects of this dystopian world lead to the downfall of the individual identity, most prominently exemplified by the death of John Savage.
The so-called Utopia – the quasi-perfect society – flourishes in Margaret Cavendish’s “The Description of a New World, Called a Blazing World” and Sir Thomas More’s Utopia. While the former is a dreamlike account of fantasy rule and the latter a pseudo-realistic travelogue, both works paint a picture of worlds that are not so perfect after all. These imperfections glitter like false gemstones in the paths of these Utopians’ religious beliefs, political systems, and philosophical viewpoints.
Utopian societies are often thought to be impractical based upon the human idea that no one person or thing can ever be completely perfect. Because this idea of perfection is practically impossible to achieve, various controlled techniques need to be used in order to create a utopia. Aldous Huxley states in his foreword to Brave New World that the creation of a perfect utopia is quite possible if we as humans “refrain from blowing ourselves to smithereens” in attempts at creating social stability (xiv). Huxley’s Brave New World “depicts a World State where there is absolute social stability made possible by government-controlled research in biology and psychology” (Woiak 4). While the existence of this utopian
Throughout 1984 and Divergent, conformity and obedience force the characters to go to great lengths in order to follow the basics and rules of the government. Throughout Orwell’s 1984, the individuals of the society hang onto every word, law, and thought of Big Brother. The citizens focus primarily on the Ministries and Party, not forming connections or relationships with others. Each member of a party have certain jobs and clothing assigned to them, separating them for others to easily detect. The same concept lies within the factions of Divergent. Each faction has a different job, and different colors to wear in order to display their role in society. The leaders of each Faction also hold the phrase “faction before blood,” depicting the same messege Big Brother enforces in 1984. Both governments want the individuals to stay within their parties, and do the jobs assigned to them. However, both novels include characters refusing to conform and obey to government rules. In 1984, Winston Smith resents Big Brother, using his knowledge from the Minitrue to reveal the lies the government spreads. Because of the disatisfaction Winston shows towards his government, O’Brien follows him, tortures him, and brainwashes him into conforming like the others. In Divergent, the government leaders label Beatrice Prior as a “divergent,” or one who possesses more than one
In 1984, George Orwell explores the many facets of a negative utopia. Orwell seems to focus on the measures that the government takes to maintain a public of plebeians who have no personality or identity and believe that they are not unique individuals, but instead are part of a greater senseless mob of people who constantly work for a hostile and oppressive government which is involved in incessant wars. These people are taught to love. They then learn to fear their government because they believe all of the propaganda that is constantly instilled into their minds. They willing follow their government without contest for the duration of their meaningless lives. The government controls all forms of the media (thus denying the people the basic right of free speech) and use it to personify the government (known as “big brother”) .The government therefore seems omnipotent, or all knowing and always correct. Forecasts are changed from one week to the next always proving the government was correct. As was mentioned before, many of the rights that present day Westerners take for gran...
There are many factors that have made an impact on society today in the modern world. The novel 1984 by George Orwell is a resemblance of how our society has developed and changed, but yet there are many ways that the novel links to the world right now. 1984 reminds everyone that their freedom can be taken away any time. The characters in the book show the audience that they can be punished for having different thoughts and opinions and are not be able to stand up for themselves. The novel itself is the society today in term of how the government is watching over the citizens, women still being treated differently and the usage of technology.
Much of what we see today may seem a little familiar. If you read the novel 1984 by George Orwell, you know exactly what I mean. Winston’s main goal in the novel is to show you how terrifying the possibilities of totalitarianism is. The dystopia he lives in is under constant surveillance by the Party, Big Brother, and the Thought Police Institute. Within these figureheads, Winston has no way of being able to think for himself without getting into trouble, so he keeps a secret diary. The novel 1984 is still relevant in today’s society because of situations happening there that has or is happening now in present times.
Revolutions and civil wars have taken place and totalitarianism has become a fact that can hardly be ignored. Therefore, the modern age has become a time in which more anti-utopias have been envisioned than ever before. A lot of authors have expressed their views on utopia in their novels. Some have done it by creating their own perfect world, while others have chosen a different path. They have been selected to voice their opinions in anti-utopian novels, or dystopia.