Comparing Leibniz's Essay On Man And Candide

1883 Words4 Pages

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, an 18th-century philosopher out of Germany, was the man who modified “an ancient concept of God and the creation” referred to as The Great Chain of Being (Benet's Reader's Encyclopedia 423). This concept of hierarchical order in the world believes a creature's level of intellect and rationality is what determines its ranking in creation. From this perspective on the world, Leibniz formulated the concept of philosophical optimism which is a belief that everything in the world is in the best state it can be. The Great Chain of Being is referenced in the works Essay on Man by Alexander Pope and Candide by Voltaire. Although the works of Pope and Voltaire argue for opposing views, both authors reference The Great Chain of Being to either support these views or satirically argue against them. Essay on Man by Alexander Pope is a poem that “sets out to consider humanity in relation to the universe, to itself, to society, and to happiness” (Puchner 89). In this poem, Pope defends the concept of The Great Chain of Being as present in the world and created by God. This philosophical poem goes into great detail of the imagery of The Great Chain of Being. Pope writes that man questions God's power, but he has no authority to rebel …show more content…

Pope defends the importance of these beliefs through demonstrating the impact it makes on a person's life when they rebel against it or live in consideration of it. In the fourth section of Essay on Man Pope claims that the cause of misery and error in the world is man's “pride of aiming at more knowledge, and pretending to more perfection” or “putting himself in the place of God” (Puchner 90). The general order, which has been set in place since the beginning of time, provides structure and the passions of

Open Document