Classic Literature and Vampires and Zombies “Elizabeth lifted her skirt, disregarding modesty, and delivered a swift kick to the creature’s head.” Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith pg. 29 Carolyn Kellogg, a writer for the LA Times, wrote a piece on a new book coming out called Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith, which was a mix of a Jane Austen classic and horror movies scares and beheadings which told up 15% of the book. She used the word ‘mashup’ to decide the new novel unknowingly creating a new category of literature (Kellogg, Carolyn). In Merriam-Webster, mashup means ‘something created by combining elements from two or more sources’, making Pride and Prejudice and Zombies a definition perfect mashup ("Mash-up”). Other authors came out with similar books like Sense and Sensibility and …show more content…
This book is a mashup, because the writer took a classic character and added something to make the character more interesting. Lincoln is continuously letting a lead vampire escape because, he must be on time to a party or gala. It would social murder to not be there during his campaign for president and marriage to Mary Todd. Instead of saving more lives, he was stuck in a ocean and rules (Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter). Both books have similarities. In Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, saying the word ‘zombie’ is improper, and in Arahma Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, ‘the milky sickness’ is a euphemism for vampires. Courting and marriage rules are still first before defending one’s self against creatures. The unique situations in combination with the creatures make the need for such a formal society illogical. Sure, people enjoy the zombie beheadings and Lincoln hacking to bits a vampire, but the reader will leave with an understanding of what ridiculous things we have put behind
The mystery of how John Wilkes Booth pulled off the most influential and notorious assassinations in history is revealed in Killing Lincoln. The author of this book, Bill O’Reilly, built up the plot of the story through vivid historical details and pieced them together like a thriller. He tries to explain all of what happened on one of the most interesting and sad days in American history. Many conspiracies and Civil War ideals are on full display in the book. I agree with most of O’Reilly’s ideas but there are some that I am not really sure about because of his point of view like many of the conspiracy theories. Killing Lincoln by Bill O’Reilly was a very compelling read which described the Civil War, lives of the conspirators, and the eventual assassination of the sixteenth president of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln.
Fahrenheit 451 and the Hunger Games are both intertwined with a futuristic version of human entertainment and a society absent of religion. Both societies are subjected to gruesome and brutal activities as a form of enjoyment. The desire for a thrill and an adrenaline rush dominates the minds of most people. In Fahrenheit 451, it’s very likely that many people succumb to their deaths from accidents but can easily replaced by members of the parlor family who they accept as their own. In the same way, The Hunger Games consists of exactly what the title suggests. They are annual games, which include starving and murder and serve as society’s primary source of entertainment. Most people don’t enjoy watching the games but, the Capitol forces the districts to watch for it believes they are a good source of entertainment. Seeing how the Hunger Games are basically murdering each other until the last child is standing, it relates closely with the kind of entertainment that the society of Fahrenheit 451 provides with the adrenaline and thrill of the same kind. The people in Fahrenheit 451 like their source of entertainment in the way they approach it but the instances of conformity remains the same. This is unlike that of the people of the districts in The Hunger Games. There is indeed a difference between the two societies yet, in the Hunger Games there is less time for many because so many people are working toward survival, while in Fahrenheit 451, entertainment is something that people do daily. The existence of adrenaline entertainment is similar in both societies. Yet they differ in whether or not the people actually like the entertainment.
The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both great examples of dystopian fiction. A dystopia is a fictional world that takes place in the future that is supposed to be perceived as a perfect society, but it’s actually the opposite. Other things that a dystopian society might display are citizens both living in a dehumanized state and feeling like they’re constantly watched by a higher power. Dystopias are places where society is backwards or unfair, and they are usually are controlled by the government, technology, or a particular religion. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both in the dystopian fiction genre because the societies within them show the traits of a dystopia. Both of them also have characters that go against the flow of the normal world.
In the book Team of Rivals, Abraham Lincoln strongly opposes slavery, he states that slavery needs to be confined to the places where it existed. Lincoln first want to stop slavery from progressing more, then he will deal with how to abolish it completely (Goodwin 9-111). In the book Lincoln Vampire Hunter the author also explains how Lincoln hates slavery, Lincoln states that slavery is a sin. However, in the vampire hunter Lincoln tries to make a connection between slavery and vampires, which is obviously inaccurate. In the vampire hunter Lincoln lets his angry get over the issue of slavery and he creates a speech that will take a national significance among the opponents of slavery (Grahame-Smith 17-132). That is how the authors showed Lincoln’s view on slavery, now the real view that Lincoln had on slavery was that he really did oppose slavery, however he still didn’t think that African American’s should have the same rights as a white person. Apparently Lincoln did not see slaves as a part of the American society, rather he saw them as an alien who were uprooted from their own society and brought overseas to America (Foner). Both of the authors used the historical facts were accurate to the real facts on slavery, however both the authors incorporated the information in two different
In the books "Divergent" by Veronica Roth and "The Maze Runner" by James Dashner, both authors talk about a teenager that is having a hard time finding out who they really are but in very different points of views. In "Divergent" Beatrice later name Tris doesn't know
Swift, Jonathan. "The Lady's Dressing Room." The Norton Anthology: English Literature. 9th ed. Vol. C. New York: Norton. 2767-30. Print.
Lincoln were very interesting and I liked that more than just having just the authors
The zombie genre is a lot more complex than I had ever imagined. Like many people, I thought of them as just gory, cannibalistic monsters dreamed up to gross people out. I really paid no attention to the genre, thinking that the movies and books were not my cup or tea. I was unaware of the history of the zombie, and the fact that much of the modern day zombie tales are actually deeply rooted in social commentary. As a student of sociology, seeing the zombie genre from this perspective was quite eye opening. The most profound realization for me was how much importance people place on material objects that really are not that vital in the grand scheme of life. I knew that humans were ultra consumeristic, but seeing these movies and reading the books, my perspective on my own life, and what is important, has begun to shift.
Literature is constanting changing from different styles and different subjects. However, there are repeating themes/dualities that occur. These dualities including appearance/ reality, morality/immorality, and lightness/heaviness. By recognizing these dualities, readers can learn to reevaluate and deal with their own personal lives.
First Impressions First impressions are very important. In the Victorian age, people based their whole opinion of someone on first impressions. Most times the first impression of someone is not the way they truly are. Sometimes a first impression can cause you to think negative of someone but later you find out that they are very nice and a very positive person. One example is when Mr. Darcy meets Elizabeth in the book ,Pride and Prejudice.
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is a timeless social comedy which is both satirical and full of sentiment. The title refers to the personalities of the two main characters and cues the reader to Austen’s broader thematic purpose: to satirize nineteenth century manners and morals, especially as they relate to courtship and manners. Although both characters contain both these traits, it is mainly Mr. Darcy who exemplifies ‘pride’ while Elizabeth Bennet exemplifies ‘prejudice.’ However, one of the book’s many ironies is that the prejudiced Elizabeth thinks it is Mr. Darcy who has the overall prejudiced disposition. Likewise, proud Darcy thinks it is Elizabeth who is most often proud. Through the course of the novel, these characters grow and through each other, discover their own foibles-- Elizabeth is indeed prejudiced and Darcy is indeed proud. Armed with this growth and heightened moral insight, the couple is rewarded with happiness and fulfillment at the end of the novel. But what if their initial beliefs were correct? Let’s say that Mr. Darcy’s pride and Elizabeth’s prejudice were switched within the context of Austen’s plot and narrative structure. Could a proud Elizabeth and a prejudice Darcy grow in self-awareness through the circumstances of the novel and gain a better understanding of human condition? Before Austen allows her characters to have a ‘fairy-tale’ ending, they must undergo self-growth. Given Austen’s overall view of English class structure and her empathy towards independent and spirited young women, it would be unlikely that Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy would resolve their differences and grow as human beings.
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
Within the works of Interview with the Vampire and The Picture of Dorian Gray, there are many found commonalities. These two books are well known for their risky content as well as for their beautiful word usage. To compare, both Anne Rice and Oscar Wilde present a character in their stories whom contains the trait to never grow out of his or her youthful beauty and demeanor. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, the character happens to go by the name of Dorian Gray. Likewise, in Interview with the Vampire, the character’s name is Claudia.
There are several things I wish I could change about myself as far as my appearance: my hair type, my body figure, how big my feet are, etc. There is something, however, that I wish I could change about my personality: being a pushover. I have been through several things in the seventeen years I have been alive, like dealing with my biological father and boyfriends cheating on me, that have influenced this part of me. No matter how hard I try to change it or correct it, I always seem to fall back into my old habits. In the book Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, Lizzy is one of the main characters. She is independent and has no problem voicing her opinions (33). For those reasons, I admire her. However, she also tends to be
children will marry him. In fact, "the business of her life was to get her