Comparing Jane Austen's Pride And Prejudice And Much Ado About Nothing

1766 Words4 Pages

Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, is an epic love story about two prideful people who fall in love. Throughout the novel, they hate each other because they were quick to judge one another. Then once they realize they were wrong their pride stops them from apologizing and forgiving each other. In the novel Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, she demonstrates that first appearances are not correct as shown through the way she portrays the characters when she first introduces them.
In pride and prejudice the story follows the main character of Elizabeth. She is a character who is not afraid to speak her mind and share her true feelings. “She resists accepting all people uncritically. She is quick to recognize most people's principal characteristics—for …show more content…

They start of hating each other, then one likes one but the other doesn't know they feel the same way, and then they both like each other but are too stubborn to admit it, but finally they put aside their differences and get together. “The moral comedy of the misunderstandings between Elizabeth Bennet and Darcy has been compared, by several critics, to the combat of wit between Beatrice and Benedick in Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing. As a comparison, this has limited usefulness: Elizabeth is not primarily a wit or a social ironist. Her true Shakespearean precursor is Rosalind in As You Like It. Rosalind resorts to furious wit in properly squelching Jaques and Touchstone, but her fundamental strength is a sure sense of self, with the wisdom that only an accurate self-estimate can bring. Such wisdom transcends detachment and welcomes a generous concern with other selves. It leads to a pride that is also playful, which is an intense contrast to Darcy's implacable pride. His sense of self relies upon an immense conviction of personal as well as societal eminence. We cannot dispute his conviction; he is intellectually formidable, morally fair-minded, and a better judge of character than Elizabeth sometimes proves to be. But his aggressiveness is excessive, despite Elizabeth's final, justified verdict: "He is frequently amiable." There is a touch of the quixotic in Elizabeth, while Darcy stands outside what could be termed the order of play. Tact without playfulness can yield too readily to moral zeal; but the quixotic not only can be tactless, it can decay into misguided exuberance.”(Bloom 1) The challenging relationship between Darcy and Elizabeth is intriguing. Their pride and judgements get in the way of each other's happiness but their love for each other overcomes those obstacles. Darcy’s and Elizabeth’s love for each other really changes the way the reader

Open Document